Metamodelling of wheel–rail normal contact in railway crossings with elasto-plastic material behaviour

Abstract

A metamodel considering material plasticity is presented for computationally efficient prediction of wheel-rail normal contact in railway switches and crossings (S&C). The metamodel is inspired by the contact theory of Hertz, and for a given material, it computes the size of the contact patch and the maximum contact pressure as a function of the normal force and the local curvatures of the bodies in contact. The model is calibrated based on finite element (FE) simulations with an elastoplastic material model and is demonstrated for rail steel grade R350HT. The error of simplifying the contact geometry is discussed and quantified. For a moderate difference in contact curvature between wheel and rail, the metamodel is able to accurately predict the size of the contact patch and the maximum contact pressure. The accuracy is worse when there is a small difference in contact curvature, where the influence of variation in curvature within the contact patch becomes more significant. However, it is shown that such conditions lead to contact stresses that contribute less to accumulated plastic deformation. The metamodel allows for a vast reduction of computational effort compared to the original FE model as it is given in analytical form.

On the influence of crossing angle on long-term rail damage evolution in railway crossings

“…The present study uses the multidisciplinary iterative methodology presented in [9]. Since the time of its original publication, the methodology has been improved in terms of computational efficiency and robustness (see [6,13]). The methodology predicts the rail damage at sampled cross-sections along the crossing rail.…”

“…The normal contact problem is solved using a Hertzian-based metamodel (see [13]) that has been calibrated against 3D FE simulations of wheel-rail contact with nonlinear material properties. The metamodel was calibrated for rail contact radii (in the plane of each rail cross-section) in the interval 20; 500 ½ � mm, wheel contact radii in the plane of the wheel cross-section and in the circumferential direction in the intervals 60; 1000 ½ � mm and 450; 480 ½ � mm, respectively, and normal wheel-rail contact loads in the interval 100; 300 ½ � kN, cf.…”

Train Hunting Related Fast Degradation of a Railway Crossing—Condition Monitoring and Numerical Verification

“…Compared with the normal track, the current studies on railway crossings are mainly based on numerical simulation. Typical contributions include wheel-rail interaction analysis [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], damage analysis [16,17,22,23], and prediction [18,24,25] as well as crossing geometry and track stiffness optimization for better dynamic performance [16,26]. Field measurements are mainly used for the validation of numerical models.…”

New Insights from Multibody Dynamic Analyses of a Turnout System under Impact Loads

“…In other words, a specific location rather than a whole turnout is selected to investigate the dynamic behavior. There have been recent attempts to deal with computational costs [27,30] which, while promising, are still insufficient to expand the simulation scale.…”