2011
DOI: 10.1130/b30376.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metamorphic history of the central Himalaya, Annapurna region, Nepal, and implications for tectonic models

Abstract: Pressure-temperature-time (P-T-t) conditions of metamorphism have been determined in the Annapurna region of central Nepal that place new constraints on the structural and tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogenic wedge. Peak P-T conditions increase structurally upward: ~525 °C and 8 kbar in the Lesser Himalayan sequence, 650 °C and 12 kbar at the base of the Greater Hima layan sequence across the Main Central thrust, 750 °C and 12 kbar in the middle of the Greater Himalayan sequence, and 775 °C and 13 kbar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
203
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
13
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carosi et al, 2007Carosi et al, , 2010Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Larson et al, 2013;Montomoli et al, 2013;see Montomoli et al, 2014 for a review) have shown that the GHS has a much more complex crustal architecture compared to simple models where a single coherent tectonic unit is bounded by only two tectonic discontinuities with opposite sense of shear. These recent findings are also compatible with diachronic melting within the GHS (Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Kohn et al, 2005;Rubatto et al, 2013). As stated above, our samples are localized c. 1 km north of the MCT location according to Colchen et al (1986) and Vannay and Hodges (1996), recently mapped as CT by Parsons et al (2014), whereas the MCT has been shifted more than 10 km to the south according to Searle (2010).…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Carosi et al, 2007Carosi et al, , 2010Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Larson et al, 2013;Montomoli et al, 2013;see Montomoli et al, 2014 for a review) have shown that the GHS has a much more complex crustal architecture compared to simple models where a single coherent tectonic unit is bounded by only two tectonic discontinuities with opposite sense of shear. These recent findings are also compatible with diachronic melting within the GHS (Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Kohn et al, 2005;Rubatto et al, 2013). As stated above, our samples are localized c. 1 km north of the MCT location according to Colchen et al (1986) and Vannay and Hodges (1996), recently mapped as CT by Parsons et al (2014), whereas the MCT has been shifted more than 10 km to the south according to Searle (2010).…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both the high metamorphic peak temperatures (500-700˚C at 8-11 kbar; e.g., Guillot, 1999;Pitra et al, 2010;Corrie and Kohn, 2011) and the thermal inversion intensities (generally comprised between 10 and 50˚C.km -1 ; e.g., Kohn, 2008;Pitra et al, 2010) can be reproduced.…”
Section: Shear Heating the Key Parametermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(e.g., Bilham et al, 1997;Lavé and Avouac, 2000). High metamorphic temperature peaks within the MCT reach 600 to 650˚C and pressure peaks are of 8 to 11 kbar (e.g., Macfarlane, 1995;Guillot, 1999;Corrie and Kohn, 2011), corresponding to depths of about 30-40 km (assuming that these pressures correspond to lithostatic pressures). In agreement with the kinematical constraints, Fig.…”
Section: Applicability To the Himalayan Inverted Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Imayama et al, 2012 , Corrie andKohn, 2011;, Wang et al, 2013;, Regis et al, 2014 High Himalayan Discontinuity; Figs. 4a, 5a -MCT MCT Kohn et al, 2001;Imayama et al, 2010MCT -Harris et al, 2004Imayama et al, 2010Imayama et al, , 2012 Khaghn valley Nanga Parbat syntaxis Tso Morari Fig Pressure-temperature (P-T) diagram with equilibrium curves for fluid-saturated melting and mica dehydration reactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%