1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00377644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphonological abilities of Japanese children

Abstract: Linguists generally conceive of speech as a sequence of elementary soundunits or "phones". On the other hand, cognitive psychologists have established the existence of a close link between segmental awareness (SA) and alphabetic literacy: the best speech segmenters are also the best readers; conversely, the lack of SA leads to lagging in the acquisition of the written code. Studies carded out with illiterate adults and preliterate children suggest that SA does not arise outside the context of learning to read … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differential rate of decline in the phonemic condition is presumably attributable to the differential orthographic experiences in their respective languages, i.e., Japanese first-graders learn syllabaries and logography, while American children learn an alphabet. Spagnoletti et al (1989) replicated Mann's study with two groups of Japanese first-graders in Brussels: one group learned to read a Roman alphabet, subsequent to the Japanese writing systems, while the other learned the Japanese scripts only. The researchers found that (1) both groups performed better in the syllable, than phoneme, condition; and (2) despite the differential alphabetic experience, the groups did not differ in their phoneme manipulation skills.…”
Section: Phonemic Awareness Among Nonalphabetic Readerssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The differential rate of decline in the phonemic condition is presumably attributable to the differential orthographic experiences in their respective languages, i.e., Japanese first-graders learn syllabaries and logography, while American children learn an alphabet. Spagnoletti et al (1989) replicated Mann's study with two groups of Japanese first-graders in Brussels: one group learned to read a Roman alphabet, subsequent to the Japanese writing systems, while the other learned the Japanese scripts only. The researchers found that (1) both groups performed better in the syllable, than phoneme, condition; and (2) despite the differential alphabetic experience, the groups did not differ in their phoneme manipulation skills.…”
Section: Phonemic Awareness Among Nonalphabetic Readerssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…and Bertelson (1987) have suggested that prereaders acquire, from corrective feedback, a procedure for deleting the initial consonant, which consists in finding the first vocalic sound as an attack point for the answer and which presumably differs from the operation that is used by literate people. Spagnoletti, Morais, Alegria, and Dominicy (1989) found results supporting the idea that Japanese children can perform correctly in the same task by resorting to the Kana matrix, which they learn at school. AH this shows that one should not attribute a particular operation to a metaphonological task on an intuitive basis; some independent empirical evidence is required.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although obtaining similar results for Japanese children attending school in Brussels, Spagnoletti, Morais, Alegria, and Dominicy (1989) noted that Mann had neglected several issues relating to the properties of the hiragana syllabary in her explanatory framework. We note that there were additional methodological problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%