2007
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amn008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphor Use in Three UK University Lectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported by Low et al (2008) in the study of metaphors in three academic lectures. The authors argued that metaphor signaling was inconsistent and infrequent, and they related the differences detected to the degree of discourse formality.…”
Section: Metaphor Signalingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were reported by Low et al (2008) in the study of metaphors in three academic lectures. The authors argued that metaphor signaling was inconsistent and infrequent, and they related the differences detected to the degree of discourse formality.…”
Section: Metaphor Signalingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Newspaper writing is highly creative and rich in expressions, exhibiting a higher figurative density than the political briefings, which in general confirms findings on written and spoken discourse by Wallington et al (2003). What is interesting is that sort of is also used in newspaper writing, in addition to being used in informal lectures, as discussed in Low et al (2008). These are two very different genres and levels of formality, and this indicates that the signal itself might be used in different genres; that is, within any one study, comparisons may be made regarding what types of signals are used and how frequently they are used, but it is difficult to draw comparisons across studies that focus on small samples of discourse using different methodological approaches.…”
Section: Metaphor Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Littlemore (2001Littlemore ( , 2003 points out that metaphors in university lectures cause problems of understanding among international students, which is quite unexpected for lecturers. Both metaphor identification techniques described by Low et al (2007) rely on researchers' ability to discriminate between metaphorical and non-metaphorical use of a language. The first technique, the Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), rests on isolating lexical items that are used metaphorically (Steen 2004, Pragglejaz Group 2007, leading to quantitative analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the other side of the coin is that metaphor can be a useful guide to the structure of dialogue and to summarisation, because certain types of metaphor are often used by speakers to signal topic changes, to summarise a segment of dialogue that has just occurred or is about to occur, or to refer to the structure of the discourse itself (Cameron 2003;Drew and Holt 1998;Low et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%