Metaphors and linguistic image in the analysis of phraseological units of the archaic Olonkho narrative

Zakharov, Maximilian A.; Prokopieva, Svetlana Mitrofanovna; Zakharova, Agafja E.

doi:10.46925//rdluz.34.31

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also, it was shown that the emotive and sensonymic components of Tatar idioms is determined by Tatar history, culture and traditions (Khasanzyanova, 2018;Yahin et al, 2017;Sibgaeva et al, 2021); the same seems to be true for the Uzbek linguistic worldview (Yuldashev, 2020). According to the study of phraseological units with a numerical component in the Yakut language, these units describe the appearance of the heaven hero and the underground creature from the Olonkho (Zakharov et al, 2021). In Chinese, phraseological units with zoonyms reflect the roles of certain animals in the life of the Chinese ethnos (Daulet et al, 2019).…”

Section: Review Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling the Linguistic Worldview: Subject Field Scoping Review

Zakharova¹,

Baranovskaya²,

Antonova³

et al. 2022

JLE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The linguistic worldview theory stems from Humboldt’s ideas concerning the interdependence of language and its speakers. Since Humboldt’s time national linguistic worldviews remain a challenging aspect of linguistic research accounting for a significant number of publications. Since linguistic worldview is a multi-faceted phenomenon, studies differ in terms of the facets they investigate and applied methodology. The linguistic worldview research has covered a wide array of linguistic worldview fragments and utilised monolingual material as well as cross-linguistic analysis of worldview fragments. However, so far, little attention has been paid to the analysis of this ever-increasing body of research and quite few studies have attempted to review the literature in this field. Purpose. The subject field scoping review aims to overview the available literature on national linguistic worldviews and answers the three questions: What is a diachronic change of researchers’ interest in the issue? What fragments of linguistic worldview have been investigated comprehensively? What are the most frequently used methods of modelling the linguistic worldview? Methods. The literature for the scoping review was retrieved from the three electronic databases: SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Google Scholar. Literature selection was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). To generate a list of current research directions, which rest on the analysis of fragments of linguistic worldview, the visualisation map of authors’ key words was created using the VOSviewer software. Results and Implications. The concise scoping review of the previously published literature on linguistic worldview shows that most publications date between 2015 and 2021 and the years yielding most publications are 2018 and 2019. The number of publications mentioning linguistic worldview grew each year within the study period. The analysis of linguistic worldview fragments helped to identify six directions of researchers’ interest in the linguistic worldview field which include lexical fragments, linguistic worldview and consciousness, phraseological fragments, reflection of linguistic worldview in different discourses, linguistic worldview in translation and teaching, and grammar fragments. The most frequently used methods of modelling the linguistic worldview are an associative psycholinguistic experiment, a conceptual analysis, and a comparative method.

show abstract

Section: Review Papermentioning

confidence: 99%