The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence 2019
DOI: 10.1515/9783839447192-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphors We Live By

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data possesses an “inherent humanness” since it is premised on the “almost literal mining of subjectivity” (Lemov, 2016, emphasis original) or the extraction of “human experience as free raw material” (Zuboff, 2019: 5). This premise has been carried over into critical AI studies, where it is held that the “data used today in ML, and especially DL, is all too human” (Roberge and Castelle, 2021: 10) and that “AI should be owned by the people, because it is overwhelmingly ‘fed’ by the people” (Dippel, 2021: 40).…”
Section: Context: Data-intensive Capital and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data possesses an “inherent humanness” since it is premised on the “almost literal mining of subjectivity” (Lemov, 2016, emphasis original) or the extraction of “human experience as free raw material” (Zuboff, 2019: 5). This premise has been carried over into critical AI studies, where it is held that the “data used today in ML, and especially DL, is all too human” (Roberge and Castelle, 2021: 10) and that “AI should be owned by the people, because it is overwhelmingly ‘fed’ by the people” (Dippel, 2021: 40).…”
Section: Context: Data-intensive Capital and Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%