2014
DOI: 10.1111/meta.12080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metaphysical Infinitism and the Regress of Being

Abstract: This article offers a limited defense of metaphysical “infinitism,” the view that there are, or might be, infinite chains of ontological dependence. According to a widespread presupposition, there must be an ultimate ground of being—most likely, a plurality of fundamental atoms. Contrary to this view, this article shows that metaphysical infinitism is internally coherent. In particular, a parallel with the debate concerning infinitism about epistemic justification is suggested, and an “emergence model” of bein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…□ ∀x ∀y (∀P (Px ↔ Py) → x = y) 41 The coherence of infinitism about grounding was defended both in metaphysics and in the philosophy of physics. See, among others, Morganti (2014Morganti ( , 2018, Tahko (2014), Bohn (2018), andBliss (2019). Loss (2021) positively argues that, granted certain assumptions about grounding, there are no ungrounded facts.…”
Section: Anti-haecceitism Without Fundamentalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…□ ∀x ∀y (∀P (Px ↔ Py) → x = y) 41 The coherence of infinitism about grounding was defended both in metaphysics and in the philosophy of physics. See, among others, Morganti (2014Morganti ( , 2018, Tahko (2014), Bohn (2018), andBliss (2019). Loss (2021) positively argues that, granted certain assumptions about grounding, there are no ungrounded facts.…”
Section: Anti-haecceitism Without Fundamentalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Infinitely descending grounding structures have been widely discussed, although they are not generally explicitly said to be infinitely ascending as well (i.e., such that every fact grounds some other fact). For some recent partial defenses of infinitely descending grounding structures, see Schaffer (2003), Bliss (2013) and Morganti (2014). Bohn (2009) defends the possibility of "hunky" worlds, in which every object has further proper parts, and every object is a proper part of something else.…”
Section: Non-foundationalist Grounding Structures Theoretical Unification Metaphysical Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaphysical infinitism is the view that are, or might be, infinitely descending chains of grounding, for a further explanation and defense of this view, see(Morganti, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%