Flexible Query Answering Systems 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6075-3_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metareasoning Agents for Query-Answering Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical arrows between S and Q, and S and Q , respectively, indicate that Q and Q are sets of queries and views defined on S and S , respectively. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to find a synchronization for all the queries and views upon a schema modification, especially when the schema evolution is capacity reducing (see Lakshmanan et al [1993] and Rundensteiner et al [1997]) or when the schema is considerably altered (see Barklund et al [1997] and Polese and Vacca [2009a]). In these cases, it is necessary to decide whether the query/view must be dropped or the schema evolution inhibited, in order to preserve the correct functioning of all the queries and views.…”
Section: The Qvs Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical arrows between S and Q, and S and Q , respectively, indicate that Q and Q are sets of queries and views defined on S and S , respectively. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to find a synchronization for all the queries and views upon a schema modification, especially when the schema evolution is capacity reducing (see Lakshmanan et al [1993] and Rundensteiner et al [1997]) or when the schema is considerably altered (see Barklund et al [1997] and Polese and Vacca [2009a]). In these cases, it is necessary to decide whether the query/view must be dropped or the schema evolution inhibited, in order to preserve the correct functioning of all the queries and views.…”
Section: The Qvs Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of RCL came from the observation that Reflection principles can specify not only the shift between levels, but also many other meta-reasoning principles. For instance, reflection principles can define forms of analogical reasoning [21], and synchronous communication among logical agents [6,12].…”
Section: Meta-reasoning and Reflection In Artificial Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A formalization of analogical reasoning in this reflective logic was elaborated in [25]. Reflection was used to represent communication among different theories/agents in [10,20]. The very idea that a common view underlying such diverse contexts could be systematized in the unifying framework of reflection principles was first advanced in [21].…”
Section: Related Work and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%