2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metastasis-directed Therapy in Treating Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis Comparing the Outcome and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Elective Nodal Radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
70
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This proportionally lower bRFS rate of the current patient cohort with SLND is comparable to a recent retrospective, multicentre analysis on SBRT vs. ENRT [31]: ENRT was associated with significantly better 3-year metastasisfree survival (77% vs. 68%) and significantly fewer individuals with local progression (9 vs. 50 patients) compared to SBRT. Like non-extensive SLND, SBRT treats only the PET-positive lymph nodes, whereas ENRT, as it was performed in the current cohort, not only treats the PET-positive, affected nodes, but the whole lymphatic drainage, for instance the entire pelvic lymphatic pathway as well as in general the prostatic fossa especially in patients with locally advanced disease or positive surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This proportionally lower bRFS rate of the current patient cohort with SLND is comparable to a recent retrospective, multicentre analysis on SBRT vs. ENRT [31]: ENRT was associated with significantly better 3-year metastasisfree survival (77% vs. 68%) and significantly fewer individuals with local progression (9 vs. 50 patients) compared to SBRT. Like non-extensive SLND, SBRT treats only the PET-positive lymph nodes, whereas ENRT, as it was performed in the current cohort, not only treats the PET-positive, affected nodes, but the whole lymphatic drainage, for instance the entire pelvic lymphatic pathway as well as in general the prostatic fossa especially in patients with locally advanced disease or positive surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, an alternative to HT monotherapy has long been sought. Among the alternative treatment methods, both MDT via SBRT and the surgical dissection of metastatic nodes have been tested for efficacy and feasibility in many prospective studies and retrospective series [ 3–5 , 15 ]. In the current study, treatment with sPRT combined with long-term HT resulted in a 5-year BF-free rate of 62.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…conducted a retrospective analysis of failure patterns following MDT (SBRT for recurrent nodes alone or elective nodal radiation therapy) in patients with nodal oligo-recurrent hormone-sensitive PCa (N1 and/or M1a). They reported that further lymph nodal progression occurred less frequently in the group treated with elective nodal radiation therapy than in the group treated with SBRT for recurrent nodes alone ( P < 0.001), especially in the pelvic region (4% vs 31%, respectively, P < 0.001) [ 3 ]. In our patients, treatment with sPRT resulted in 100% regional control, which was consistent with the findings in previous reports regarding regional irradiation [ 3 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, current guidelines recommend prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)-imaging if the outcome will affect treatment planning (1). Promising efficacy of metastasesdirected therapy such as salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) or salvage radiotherapy (S-RT) has been reported in several studies (2,3), but evidence on the long-term oncological impact is missing. In patients with longer PSA doubling times, lower RP specimen pathological ISUP grades and disease recurrence confined to lymph nodes, metastases-directed therapy aims at decreased risk of distant progression, later onset of ADT and potential improvement of cancer-specific survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%