6 Weatherhead SC, Haniffa M, Lawrence CM. Melanomas arising from naevi and de novo melanomas-does origin matter? Br J Dermatol 2007; 156:72-6. 7 Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2135-47. SIR, The article 'The ultrastructure of acantholysis in pemphigus vulgaris' by Drs Diercks, Pas and Jonkman 1 confirms prior electron microscopic observations made by multiple investigators in patients with pemphigus 2-4 and in in vitro and in vivo models of pemphigus acantholysis. 5-7 These and the article by Diercks et al. 1 show that the initial event in pemphigus acantholysis is the separation of keratinocytes from each other at sites where there are no desmosomes. Desmosomes do not separate from each other until very late in acantholysis, if at all. Often, desmosomes continue to stick so tightly to each other that they are ripped off from acantholytic keratinocytes without coming apart.We have previously summarized these and other observations and their implications. 8,9 They lead to two important conclusions: (i) acantholysis in pemphigus is not caused by loss of desmosomal adhesion due to autoantibodies blocking the adhesive properties of desmogleins; and (ii) rather, they suggest acantholysis occurs because the cytoskeleton of keratinocytes is disrupted causing these cells to collapse and to shrink more than desmosomes can hold them together. We call this the 'basal cell shrinkage hypothesis'. 8 Recently published experimental results have further substantiated this hypothesis. 10 We are pleased the observations of Diercks et al. 1 provide further support for it.