Metastatic Lung Cancer and Distress: Use of the Distress Thermometer for Patient Assessment

Sherry, Victoria E.; Guerra, Carmen E.; Ranganathan, Anjana; Schneider, Susan

doi:10.1188/17.cjon.379-383

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Quanto ao cargo ou função do enfermeiro que utilizou Coaching, identifica-se em 48% dos artigos (n=16) enfermeiros assistenciais (Sullivan, et al, 2019;Rahn, et al, 2018;Petursdottir, et al, 2019;Hazard, et al, 2018;Berger-Höger, Liethmann, Mühlhauser & Steckelberg, 2017;Early, et al, 2017;Sherry, et al, 2017;Gray-Miceli, et al, 2017;Cooper & Zimmerman, 2016;Janice, Karen, Justine, Sonya & Genevieve, 2015;Bakitas, et al, 2015), 27% (n=8) o enfermeiro pesquisador (Rocha, et al, 2019;Tweedie, et al, 2019;Miyamoto, et al, 2019;Petursdottir, et al, 2019;Berry, et al, 2015), 6% (n=2) de enfermeiros gerentes (Hazard, et al, 2018;, 6% (n=2) de enfermeiros externos (Ouden, et al, 2019;Nyamathi, et al, 2015) e 6% (n=2) enfermeiros de prática avançada Dionne-Odom, et al, 2015), e enfermeiro docente (Ubolrat, et al, 2015) e enfermeiro intervencionista em 3% (n=1) dos artigos.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Quanto ao tipo de treinamento dos enfermeiros no papel de coach, 36% (n=12) dos artigos não descrevem (Piamjariyakul, et al, 2019;Petty & Lingham, 2019;Noh & Kim, 2019;Petursdottir, et al, 2019;Sherry, et al, 2017;Westland, et al, 2017;Ubolrat, et al, 2015;Berry, et al, 2015;Nyamathi, et al, 2015), 30% (n=10) sinalizam oficinas, workshops, cursos ou treinamentos com textos e vídeos (Tweedie, et al, 2019;Rahn, et al, 2018;Zhang, et al, 2017;Gray-Miceli, et al, 2017;Cooper & Zimmerman, 2016;Janice, et al, 2015;Thoonsen, et al, 2015;Bakitas, et al, 2015;Dionne-Odom, et al, 2015) e 27% (n=9) artigos informa treinamento na ferramenta, técnica ou protocolo aplicado (Sullivan, et al, 2019;Ouden, et al, 2019;Hazard, et al, 2018;Berger-Höger, et al, 2017;Early, et al, 2017; e 6% (n=2) sinalizam formação certificada em Coaching (Rocha, et al, 2019;Miyamoto, et al, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Durante seu trabalho busca conduzir interações respeitosas e sem julgamento, acreditando na capacidade de mudança do coachee (Wolever, et al, 2013). São coachees, pacientes com doenças ou condições crônicas de saúde Rahn, et al, 2018;Early, et al, 2017;Sherry, et al, 2017;Gray-Miceli, et al, 2017;Janice, et al, 2015), pacientes com câncer (Hazard, et al, 2018;Berger-Höger, et al, 2017;Berry, et al, 2015;, cuidadores , crianças em idade escolar (Thoonsen, et al, 2015), soldados e homens sem teto em liberdade condicional (Nyamathi, et al, 2015). Research, Society andDevelopment, v. 9, n. 11, e61291110167, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10167 Percebe-se, em particular nos artigos de autores com filiação institucional nos Estados Unidos, interesse no desenvolvimento de estudos que utilizam Coaching com um público que pode vir a aumentos os custos em relação aos cuidados demandados nos serviços de saúde e diminuir a qualidade de vida das pessoas, como doenças crônicas e cuidados paliativos, como maneira de atuar na prevenção dessas doenças ou gerenciamento dos sinais e sintomas.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Utilização de Coaching por Enfermeiros na prática profissional: revisão integrativa

Menegaz

Dias

Rocha

et al. 2020

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Analisar a produção científica existente sobre a utilização do Coaching por enfermeiros na prática profissional de Enfermagem. Métodos: Revisão integrativa da literatura de textos online completos publicados de 2015 a 2019 realizada em julho de 2020 na Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) e Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). Resultados: Analisa-se 33 artigos. A maioria é de natureza quantitativa, informam intervenção e está publicado em periódicos qualificados tendo o primeiro autor (a) vinculado a instituição dos Estados Unidos. Predomina a utilização de Coaching como processo por enfermeiros assistenciais na modalidade de Health Coaching. 63% dos artigos informam algum treinamento dos enfermeiros que aplicaram as intervenções. Conclusão: Maior descrição dos processos e técnicas é benéfica à compreensão da forma de utilização e potencial disseminação. Ressalta-se a necessidade de formação específica do enfermeiro ao utilizar Coaching.

show abstract

Section: Resultsunclassified

Section: Discussionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Utilização de Coaching por Enfermeiros na prática profissional: revisão integrativa

Menegaz

Dias

Rocha

et al. 2020

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The included studies had a sample size ranging from 6 [61] to 766 [31] and included multiple RCTs (16/39, 41%) [30,31,[33][34][35][37][38][39][43][44][45]48,50,57,63,67,68], with most studies being conducted in the United States (22/39, 56%) [29][30][31]33,34,[37][38][39][40][41]43,45,46,48,50,54,57,59,60,[66][67][68]. Of the 39 studies included in the review, 13 (33%) explored intervention effects in the context of routine care implementation [29,32,36,41,42,49,51,52,…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Across most studies (36/39, 92%), the frequency of times contact was made with the intervention was reported [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][45][46][47][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. There was substantial heterogeneity in the measurement of frequency across studies.…”

Section: Frequencymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Extent of Engagement With Telehealth Approaches by Patients With Advanced Cancer: Systematic Review

Goodman¹,

Bagnall²,

Ashley³

et al. 2022

JMIR Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Telehealth approaches are increasingly being used to support patients with advanced diseases, including cancer. Evidence suggests that telehealth is acceptable to most patients; however, the extent of and factors influencing patient engagement remain unclear. Objective The aim of this review is to characterize the extent of engagement with telehealth interventions in patients with advanced, incurable cancer reported in the international literature. Methods This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) and is reported in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of databases was undertaken for telehealth interventions (communication between a patient with advanced cancer and their health professional via telehealth technologies), including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science, from the inception of each electronic database up until December 31, 2020. A narrative synthesis was conducted to outline the design, population, and context of the studies. A conceptual framework of digital engagement comprising quantitative behavioral measures (frequency, amount, duration, and depth of use) framed the analysis of engagement with telehealth approaches. Frequency data were transformed to a percentage (actual patient engagement as a proportion of intended engagement), and the interventions were characterized by intensity (high, medium, and low intended engagement) and mode of delivery for standardized comparisons across studies. Results Of the 19,676 identified papers, 40 (0.2%) papers covering 39 different studies were eligible for inclusion, dominated by US studies (22/39, 56%), with most being research studies (26/39, 67%). The most commonly reported measure of engagement was frequency (36/39, 92%), with substantial heterogeneity in the way in which it was measured. A standardized percentage of actual patient engagement was derived from 17 studies (17/39, 44%; n=1255), ranging from 51% to 100% with a weighted average of 75.4% (SD 15.8%). A directly proportional relationship was found between intervention intensity and actual patient engagement. Higher engagement occurred when a tablet, computer, or smartphone app was the mode of delivery. Conclusions Understanding engagement for people with advanced cancer can guide the development of telehealth approaches from their design to monitoring as part of routine care. With increasing telehealth use, the development of meaningful and context- and condition-appropriate measures of telehealth engagement is needed to address the current heterogeneity in reporting while improving the understanding of optimal implementation of telehealth for oncology and palliative care. Trial Registration PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42018117232; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018117232

show abstract

Postoperative distress and influencing factors in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer

Jun,

Lim,

Park

et al. 2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate distress levels, using the distress thermometer (DT), and the factors associated with distress in postoperative patients with pancreatobiliary cancer. This study retrospectively investigated 155 patients who underwent surgery for pancreatobiliary cancer between December 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The DT and problem list were used to measure distress. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Of the 155 patients, 16.8% (n = 26) and 83.2% (n = 129) were in the mild-distress and moderate-to-severe distress groups, respectively. The average DT score was 6.21; that for the mild-distress and moderate-to-severe distress groups was 2.46 and 6.97, respectively. More patients in the moderate-to-severe distress group reported having problems of “sadness” (χ 2 = 4.538, P < 0.05), “indigestion” (χ 2 = 10.128, P < 0.001), “eating” (χ 2 = 6.147, P < 0.013), and “getting around” (χ 2 = 4.275, P < 0.039) than in the mild-distress group. In addition, occupation status (odds ratio [OR] = 0.342, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.133–0.879, P = 0.026) and indigestion (OR = 5.897, 95% CI = 1.647–21.111, P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for the presence of severe distress. Patients with pancreatobiliary cancer demonstrated elevated levels of psychological distress. Healthcare providers should therefore be vigilant when evaluating patients for distress and providing appropriate referrals, particularly those who are unemployed or have indigestion.

show abstract

Metastatic Lung Cancer and Distress: Use of the Distress Thermometer for Patient Assessment

Abstract: Severe distress was reported in more than half the patients. A paired-sample t test revealed a significant decrease in distress scores following the intervention.

Cited by 7 publications

References 13 publications

Utilização de Coaching por Enfermeiros na prática profissional: revisão integrativa

Utilização de Coaching por Enfermeiros na prática profissional: revisão integrativa

The Extent of Engagement With Telehealth Approaches by Patients With Advanced Cancer: Systematic Review

Postoperative distress and influencing factors in patients with pancreatobiliary cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About