2020
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00606-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metatranscriptomic Analysis of Virus Diversity in Urban Wild Birds with Paretic Disease

Abstract: Wild birds are major natural reservoirs and potential dispersers of a variety of infectious diseases. As such, it is important to determine the diversity of viruses they carry and use this information to help understand the potential risks of spill-over to humans, domestic animals, and other wildlife. We investigated the potential viral causes of paresis in long-standing, but undiagnosed, disease syndromes in wild Australian birds. RNA from diseased birds was extracted and pooled based on tissue type, host spe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence that this ancestoral species may have been a primitive Australian parrot includes the observation that PsSiAdV-F has only been detected in psittacine species where it causes predominantly subclinical infections and is widespread in captive populations of at least three species of Australian parrot: the orange-bellied parrot, the scarlet-chested parrot ( Neophema splendida ), and the Bourke’s parrot ( Neopsephotus bourkii ) [ 12 , 13 ]. Additionally, there is an extensive diversity of siadenoviruses present in wild and captive native Australian passerine species, and viruses belonging to the more recently evolved siadenovirus clade containing the psittacine siadenovirus E have also been detected in wild Australian psittacine birds [ 5 , 8 , 45 ]. Ultimate proof that PsSiAdV-F originated in Australian psittacine birds will require that it be identified in a wild Australian psittacine species, and to date, surveys of wild psittacine birds in Australia have not detected it yet [ 4 , 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that this ancestoral species may have been a primitive Australian parrot includes the observation that PsSiAdV-F has only been detected in psittacine species where it causes predominantly subclinical infections and is widespread in captive populations of at least three species of Australian parrot: the orange-bellied parrot, the scarlet-chested parrot ( Neophema splendida ), and the Bourke’s parrot ( Neopsephotus bourkii ) [ 12 , 13 ]. Additionally, there is an extensive diversity of siadenoviruses present in wild and captive native Australian passerine species, and viruses belonging to the more recently evolved siadenovirus clade containing the psittacine siadenovirus E have also been detected in wild Australian psittacine birds [ 5 , 8 , 45 ]. Ultimate proof that PsSiAdV-F originated in Australian psittacine birds will require that it be identified in a wild Australian psittacine species, and to date, surveys of wild psittacine birds in Australia have not detected it yet [ 4 , 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in theory RNA-seq can be used to identify any infecting microorganism within a sample. Similarly, metagenomic methods have been used to identify novel pathogens both in humans and in animals ( Edridge et al, 2019a , b ; Chang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a ChPV was previously identified in crocodile feces [36], it is possible that this virus originated in the tilapia fish fed to these crocodiles. Our documentation of a diarrhea and sudden death in puppies [62], and a novel lorikeet chaphamaparvovirus coinfected with psittacine circovirus (beak and feather disease virus) in wild birds has been described [63]. Recently, a similar coexistence of Tasmanian devil-associated circovirus and chaphamaparvovirus was identified in a Tasmania devil metagenomic virome study, but with no disease association [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%