2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30581-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

METEOR-S Web Service Annotation Framework with Machine Learning Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The METEOR-S Framework [14] is able to assign semantic concepts to web services by considering their WSDL descriptions but without taking into account the unstructured data potentially available within the documentation tag that can give more information about the category the web service belongs to. Instead of attaching a category concept to a web service, SAWSDL-MX2 [15] evaluates the similarity between a pair of web services based on both structured and unstructured information included in their interfaces using support vector machines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The METEOR-S Framework [14] is able to assign semantic concepts to web services by considering their WSDL descriptions but without taking into account the unstructured data potentially available within the documentation tag that can give more information about the category the web service belongs to. Instead of attaching a category concept to a web service, SAWSDL-MX2 [15] evaluates the similarity between a pair of web services based on both structured and unstructured information included in their interfaces using support vector machines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of similar approaches exist, particularly in the field of web services, such as [11,7,4], from which we can draw guidance. However, their aims and context often differ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duo et al [10] present a similar approach, which also aggregates results from several matchers. Oldham et al [11] use a simple machine learning (ML) technique, namely Naïve Bayesian Classifier, to improve the precision of service annotation. Machine learning is also used in a tool called Assam [12], which uses existing annotation of semantic web services to improve new annotations.…”
Section: Web Service Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%