2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2004.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorological assessment of the surface temperatures on Titan: constraints on the surface type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our measurements are compared in Figure 1 with predictions from Tokano (2005). That study used a three-dimensional general circulation model (GCM) of the surface and lower atmosphere to derive surface temperatures as a function of latitude over a Titan year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our measurements are compared in Figure 1 with predictions from Tokano (2005). That study used a three-dimensional general circulation model (GCM) of the surface and lower atmosphere to derive surface temperatures as a function of latitude over a Titan year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While clouds may be more numerous (Mitchell et al 2006), we find that convection however is still very weak with a CAPE∼160 J kg Ϫ1 and LNB p 26 km, in agreement with Barth & Rafkin (2007) yet not (Tokano et al 2006b) as a result of differing lapse rates (Appendix B). An increase in the surface temperature by 2 K (larger than predicted by GCM models [Tokano 2005]) would also initiate surface convection, but again does not change the CAPE significantly from that of Titan's current atmosphere. Only variations in Titan's humidity below 9 km strongly affect its stability (Barth & Rafkin 2007;Hueso & Sánchez-Lavega 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The surface temperature evolves according to the surface energy balance of a homogenous slab with heat capacity 2.5 × 10 5 J m −2 K −1 (similar to that of a porous icy regolith 47 ) , with temperature tendencies balanced by insolation, thermal radiative fluxes, and the surface fluxes of sensible heat and latent heat (methane evaporation). The value of the slab heat capacity does not substantially affect our results, as long as it is much smaller than the heat capacity of the atmosphere (∼ 10 8 J m −2 K −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%