1990
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0813:mfitrd>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorological Factors Influencing the Radioactive Deposition in Finland after the Chernobyl Accident

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the volatile nuclides were mainly deposited by wet deposition processes (rainout and washout). This is confirmed by the simultaneous weather radar observations and measurements of the external radiation at the end of April 1986 (Puhakka et al, 1990). On the other hand, a significant fraction of the refractory nuclides like 95 Zr was dry-deposited during 27 April 1986 when the air mass that was located in the Chernobyl area at the time of the reactor explosion moved from the southwestern Finnish coast northeastwards across Finland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This indicates that the volatile nuclides were mainly deposited by wet deposition processes (rainout and washout). This is confirmed by the simultaneous weather radar observations and measurements of the external radiation at the end of April 1986 (Puhakka et al, 1990). On the other hand, a significant fraction of the refractory nuclides like 95 Zr was dry-deposited during 27 April 1986 when the air mass that was located in the Chernobyl area at the time of the reactor explosion moved from the southwestern Finnish coast northeastwards across Finland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The rain was considerably heavy in western areas of Finland (2.5-10 mm Turku-Tampere region) (Koivukoski, 1986;Savolainen et al, 1986). The rain brought the activity to the ground, causing notable increases in the external dose rate; in Uusikaupunki on the west coast of Finland, the dose rate increased from 0.2 to 4 µSv/h (Puhakka et al, 1990). In eastern parts of Finland, the advancing air met a cold northerly airstream resulting in icy rainfall and thunderstorms.…”
Section: First Observations In Sweden and Finlandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"damp" aerosol scavenging with atmospheric precipitation ("washout") (see e.g. Clark and Smith, 1988;Puhakka, 1990). However precipitation was not observed when the southern radioactive trace was forming on the territory of Ukraine (Sedunov, 1989, Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%