2019
DOI: 10.1175/wcas-d-18-0084.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meteorologists’ Interpretations of Storm-Scale Ensemble-Based Forecast Guidance

Abstract: During the 2017 Spring Forecasting Experiment in NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed, 62 meteorologists completed a survey designed to test their understanding of forecast uncertainty. Survey questions were based on probabilistic forecast guidance provided by the NSSL Experimental Warn-on-Forecast System for ensembles (NEWS-e). A mix of 20 multiple-choice and open-ended questions required participants to explain basic probability and percentile concepts, extract information using graphical representations of unce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one study investigated professional weather forecasters understanding of a chart color-coded in shades of red and blue, indicating probability of accumulated rainfall greater than 0.01 inch. A full third of forecasters interpreted the increased color intensity (red in this case) as greater accumulation rather than greater likelihood (Wilson et al, 2019). Another example is a study of colorcoded climate outlook graphics for temperature (Gerst et al, 2020), intended for use by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).…”
Section: Deterministic Construal Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study investigated professional weather forecasters understanding of a chart color-coded in shades of red and blue, indicating probability of accumulated rainfall greater than 0.01 inch. A full third of forecasters interpreted the increased color intensity (red in this case) as greater accumulation rather than greater likelihood (Wilson et al, 2019). Another example is a study of colorcoded climate outlook graphics for temperature (Gerst et al, 2020), intended for use by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).…”
Section: Deterministic Construal Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, extreme or hazardous weather events such as tornadoes, hail, and damaging winds usually demand quick delivery of forecast products. Despite emerging computer technologies, running a large number of high‐resolution ensemble members remains prohibitively expensive and time‐consuming; (c) To decide what uncertainty information (e.g., probabilities, forecaster confidence) is actually needed and how to communicate it to the public is a challenging task (Wilson et al ., 2019; Demuth et al ., 2020). Nevertheless, a poor decision might be made if based only on a single‐value forecast without accounting for any uncertainty information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system uses the WRF-ARW as its dynamic core and includes two components, the WRF-DART ensemble analysis and forecast component (NEWS-e) and a deterministic hybrid 3DEnVAR analysis and forecast component (NEWS-var). The NEWS-e component has been extensively tested in HWT spring experiments in recent years (e.g., Jones et al 2018;Skinner et al 2018;Wilson et al 2019). The NEWS-var component was tested as a high-resolution analysis system for severe weather (e.g., Gao et al 2013;Calhoun et al 2014), but has not been extensively tested as a short-term forecast system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%