1997
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170460014003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metered-Dose Inhaler Accessory Devices in Acute Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this first systematic review in almost 500 infants or children under 5 years of age with acute wheezing or asthma exacerbation are in agreement with systematic reviews performed in adults and older children with asthma exacerbation who visit the ED. 5,9,46 In our meta-analysis, we also looked at secondary outcomes of side effects (heart rate, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturation) that sometimes occur with b-agonist administration through different systems (eg, MDI+VHC or nebulizer). However, this was difficult to analyze because of insufficient data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this first systematic review in almost 500 infants or children under 5 years of age with acute wheezing or asthma exacerbation are in agreement with systematic reviews performed in adults and older children with asthma exacerbation who visit the ED. 5,9,46 In our meta-analysis, we also looked at secondary outcomes of side effects (heart rate, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturation) that sometimes occur with b-agonist administration through different systems (eg, MDI+VHC or nebulizer). However, this was difficult to analyze because of insufficient data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] As early as 1997, a review of 10 randomized, controlled trials involving 575 pediatric patients recommended that MDIs with holding chambers be considered the preferred mode of treatment in children with acute asthma.…”
Section: Ré Sumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary objective was to retrospectively document the components of the intervention and their timing. Quieter Reduced cost for medication and medical devices 3,6,7,10,36 Reduced morbidity 5,6 Reduced risk of cross-infection 11,37 Reduced staffing costs 12,36 Reduced administration time 1,3,4,6,10 Reduced time in department 3,4 Reduced morbidity/potentially reduced admissions 6,7 Reduced time and risk in maintenance of the nebulizer system in the community setting 6,10 Valuable opportunity for teaching and reinforcement 3,6,11 Increased staff satisfaction…”
Section: Ré Sumémentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of VHCs has greatly improved the efficacy of MDIs for young children by creating a reservoir of aerosol that can be inhaled for 3 to 5 seconds after actuation, eliminating the need for hand-breath coordination and for slow, deep inhalation. 13 An alternative to the MDI is the small-volume nebulizer (SVN). Advantages to SVNs include use at any age, administration while asleep, use of oxygen or helium plus oxygen as driving gas, and variable drug combination (b-agonist, anticholinergic, epinephrine, inhaled corticosteroid).…”
Section: Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%