Methadone and suboxone^® mentions on twitter: thematic and sentiment analysis

Abstract

Background: According to the latest medical evidence, Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone V R ) are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). While the evidence basis for the use of these medications is favorable, less is known about the perceptions of the general public about them.Objective: This study aimed to use Twitter to assess the public perceptions about methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, and to compare their discussion contents based on themes/topics, subthemes, and sentiment. Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis of a small and automatic analysis of a large volume of microposts ("tweets") that mentioned "methadone" or "suboxone". In the manual analysis, we categorized the tweets into themes and subthemes, as well as by sentiment and personal experience, and compared the information posted about these two medications. We performed automatic topic modeling and sentiment analysis over large volumes of posts and compared the outputs to those from the manual analyses. Results: We manually analyzed 900 tweets, most of which related to access (15.3% for methadone; 14.3% for buprenorphine-naloxone), stigma (17.0%; 15.5%), and OUD treatment (12.8%; 15.6%). Only a small proportion of tweets (16.4% for Suboxone V R and 9.3% for methadone) expressed positive sentiments about the medications, with few tweets describing personal experiences. Tweets mentioning both medications primarily discussed MOUD broadly, rather than comparing the two medications directly. Automatic topic modeling revealed topics from the larger dataset that corresponded closely to the manually identified themes, but sentiment analysis did not reveal any notable differences in chatter regarding the two medications. Conclusions: Twitter content about methadone and Suboxone V R is similar, with the same major themes and similar sub-themes. Despite the proven effectiveness of these medications, there was little dialogue related to their benefits or efficacy in the treatment of OUD. Perceptions of these medications may contribute to their underutilization in combatting OUDs.

#TurntTrending: a systematic review of substance use portrayals on social media platforms

“…A total of 15 905 182 substance‐related social media posts (15 804 353 text posts, 68 023 image posts, and 32 470 video posts) were assessed across all 73 studies. Twitter data was analysed in 34 studies [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]; 23 studies examined YouTube [ 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , ...…”

Intraoperative Methadone and Short Stay Spine Surgery: Possible Barriers to Implementation and Future Opportunities

“…In a thematic analysis of online mentions, Chenworth et al found that methadone had generated more extreme negative opinions then positive opinions, and stigma was the second most common theme mentioned online. 15…”

Pemilihan Metode dan Algoritma dalam Analisis Sentimen di Media Sosial : Sistematic Literature Review

“…Penelitian terdahulu menunjukkan bahwa sentimen merupakan pusat dari pelbagai kajian komunikasi dimana negativitas dan polarisasi dalam komunikasi politik hingga ulasan produk dan komentar memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kondisi ekonomi, kehidupan sosial, politik, hingga isu-isu pembangunan yang terintegrasi dengan teknologi informasi [144]. Oleh sebab itu, aplikasi media sosial dirancang menggunakan metode serta algoritma yang dapat mendeteksi serta mengklasifikasikan tema atau topik pembahasan pengguna (user) di media sosial [145]. Hal ini menunjukkan pentingnya analisis metode dan penggunaan algoritma dalam menganalisis sentimen di media sosial.…”