1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01596683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane conversion by an air microwave plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reaction R11 is a very slow reaction and requires CH which is a product of the ATI fragmentation. In literature [26,27,28,29], reactions with atomic nitrogen are discussed. The reactions R12 to R14 describe the formation of HCN originating from C n H m molecules and N atoms.…”
Section: Fig 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction R11 is a very slow reaction and requires CH which is a product of the ATI fragmentation. In literature [26,27,28,29], reactions with atomic nitrogen are discussed. The reactions R12 to R14 describe the formation of HCN originating from C n H m molecules and N atoms.…”
Section: Fig 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the electrons could also decompose methane the following equations are also proposed [4,5] The deposition of carbon will be neglected and not considered in our case and it is assumed that the only electron interaction that is allowed concerns CO 2 and CH 4 . Table 1 shows the kinetic model [5][6][7] [8] Running this kinetic mechanisms in Reactor Engineering Lab with a 1 mol/m 3 initial concentration for both CO 2 and CH 4 gives the results in figure 5, where all the concentration profiles are shown. It can be seen that the main products are CO and H 2 , followed by H and O radicals.…”
Section: The Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 No C 2 H 6 was Figure 2 revealed that DMS was converted mainly into CS 2 at a lower R (namely, R Ͻ ϭ 0.6 or O 2 -lean environment) with a higher P, while vanishing gradually with increased concentration of O 2 . For C in ϭ 5%, the molar fraction of CS 2 (M CS2 ) reached 2.16% at P ϭ 90 W with R ϭ 0.6 (see Figure 2a) and 2.13% at P ϭ 60 W with R ϭ 0 (see Figure 2b), which could not be detected as R reached 4.5 or higher (see Figure 2b).…”
Section: Conversion Of Dms Species Of Odorous S Compounds and Odorlesmentioning
confidence: 99%