2009
DOI: 10.1080/08927020802609447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane diffusion mechanism in catenated metal–organic frameworks

Abstract: In this work, molecular dynamics simulations were performed to investigate the gas diffusion mechanism in catenated metal -organic frameworks (MOFs), for which methane was adopted as a probe and two catenated IRMOFs with interwoven structure, IRMOF-11 and IRMOF-13, were considered. This work reveals that the diffusion pathways of methane molecules in catenated MOFs are mainly governed by the strong confinement in catenation regions, leading to a 3D diffusion along the sheets formed by the A-regions (xy-directi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A slight increase in diffusion selectivities was found with increasing pressure and this can be attributed to the reason that at higher loadings CH 4 reduces the diffusivity of the faster diffusing component, H 2 , in adsorbed mixture, which causes higher diffusion selectivities toward CH 4 . In our previous work (Xue et al, 2009), we found the relative diffusivity of CH 4 and H 2 (based on the self-diffusivity of the single CH 4 and H 2 component) in the interpenetrated IRMOFs is much higher than those in their corresponding non-interpenetrated counterparts and concluded that interpenetration may significantly enhance the dynamic selectivity for CH 4 /H 2 . By examining the true mixture diffusion, however, we found that the diffusion selectivities of CH 4 /H 2 in L5-L2 and L6-L2 are comparable.…”
Section: Diffusion Selectivity and Permeation Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A slight increase in diffusion selectivities was found with increasing pressure and this can be attributed to the reason that at higher loadings CH 4 reduces the diffusivity of the faster diffusing component, H 2 , in adsorbed mixture, which causes higher diffusion selectivities toward CH 4 . In our previous work (Xue et al, 2009), we found the relative diffusivity of CH 4 and H 2 (based on the self-diffusivity of the single CH 4 and H 2 component) in the interpenetrated IRMOFs is much higher than those in their corresponding non-interpenetrated counterparts and concluded that interpenetration may significantly enhance the dynamic selectivity for CH 4 /H 2 . By examining the true mixture diffusion, however, we found that the diffusion selectivities of CH 4 /H 2 in L5-L2 and L6-L2 are comparable.…”
Section: Diffusion Selectivity and Permeation Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Electrostatic interactions were not included, as previous simulations have shown that the effects of these interactions on the adsorption of hydrogen in MOFs are very small at room temperature (Garberoglio et al, 2005). The above potential models have been successfully used to model adsorption, diffusion, and separation of methane and hydrogen in MOFs Liu et al, 2008aLiu et al, , 2008bSurblé et al, 2006;Xue et al, 2009;Yang and Zhong, 2005). For the MOFs studied here, the site-site LJ potential was used to calculate the interactions between adsorbate molecules and adsorbents.…”
Section: Force Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile there exist a large number of computer simulations (see for example refs. [12][13][14][15]) and a few experimental techniques, such as interference and infrared microscopy [16][17][18], quasi elastic neutron scattering (QENS) [19][20][21] and pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR [22,23], which allow one to determine guest diffusion in MOFs under non-equilibrium and equilibrium conditions, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%