2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane discharge from a deep-sea submarine mud volcano into the upper water column by gas hydrate-coated methane bubbles

Abstract: The assessment of climate change factors includes a constraint of methane sources and sinks. Although marine geological sources are recognized as significant, unfortunately, most submarine sources remain poorly quantified. Beside cold vents and coastal anoxic sediments, the large number of submarine mud volcanoes (SMV) may contribute significantly to the oceanic methane pool. Recent research suggests that methane primarily released diffusively from deep-sea SMVs is immediately oxidized and, thus, has little cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
216
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 279 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
11
216
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted the control experiment under the following conditions: a bubble radius of 0.3 cm which is consistent with observations Sauter et al, 2006;Egrov et al, 2003), sea-floor depth of 1000 m, the HSZ deeper than 560 m, and a methane flux of 2.5×10 −2 mol/s·m 2 (equivalent to forty bubbles with a radius of 0.3 cm released per second into the water column from 1 m 2 of the sea-floor) which is the roughly the same order of magnitude to one order of magnitude more than the flux observed in a methane seep recently under investigation (Heeschen et al, 2003;Sauter et al, 2006). We conducted the case studies with different values by changing four parameters: bubble radius, seawater temperature, water depth, and methane oxidation.…”
Section: Water-column Componentsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conducted the control experiment under the following conditions: a bubble radius of 0.3 cm which is consistent with observations Sauter et al, 2006;Egrov et al, 2003), sea-floor depth of 1000 m, the HSZ deeper than 560 m, and a methane flux of 2.5×10 −2 mol/s·m 2 (equivalent to forty bubbles with a radius of 0.3 cm released per second into the water column from 1 m 2 of the sea-floor) which is the roughly the same order of magnitude to one order of magnitude more than the flux observed in a methane seep recently under investigation (Heeschen et al, 2003;Sauter et al, 2006). We conducted the case studies with different values by changing four parameters: bubble radius, seawater temperature, water depth, and methane oxidation.…”
Section: Water-column Componentsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Almost all bubbles released from deep water can rise up hundreds of meters, but not reach the atmosphere Heeschen et al, 2003;Sauter et al, 2006;Matveeva et al, 2003). Models targeted at understanding the behavior of a single bubble ascending the seawater column utilizing observed methane concentration profiles (and other constituent boundary conditions, such as T, DO, salinity, etc) have been developed (Leifer and Patro, 2002;McGinnis et al, 2006;Zheng and Yapa, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Sea water and plume chemistry have been investigated thoroughly in other studies (Pedersen et al 2005;Sauter et al 2006;Pedersen et al 2010a;Schander et al 2010;Baumberger 2011;Tandberg et al 2011;Jørgensen et al 2012;Kongsrud and Rapp 2012;Stensland 2013), and further discussion related to chemistry will therefore follow below. Five groups dominated the three different water masses (Alveolata, Rhizaria, Protozoa, Metazoa and Heterokonta), but the internal proportion within a given sample varied.…”
Section: Community Composition Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seep (r e ) have been measured by video (Leifer, 2010;Römer et al, 2012;Sahling et al, 2009;Sauter et al, 2006) and passive acoustics. Passive acoustic (r e ) measurement has only been demonstrated for low-flow bubble plumes where the individual bubble acoustic signatures can be identified (Leifer and Tang, 2006;Maksimov et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sonar Seep Bubble Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%