Methane Emissions From Major Rice Ecosystems in Asia 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0898-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane emission from irrigated and intensively managed rice fields in Central Luzon (Philippines)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
65
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, emissions were smaller (20-40 kg ha −1 ) compared to that reported from many other countries such as Philippines (100-150 kg ha −1 ) (Corton et al, 2000) and Japan (150-200 kg ha −1 ) (Yagi et al, 1996). Lower CH 4 emission from Indian rice paddies compared to that of other countries could be due to 1) lower soil organic C status, 2) high percolation rate of sandy loam soils, which allows to leach substantial amount of DOC to lower soil profiles, 3) lower yield of rice with smaller rhizodeposition and 4) limited amount of organic residue recycling in soil.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, emissions were smaller (20-40 kg ha −1 ) compared to that reported from many other countries such as Philippines (100-150 kg ha −1 ) (Corton et al, 2000) and Japan (150-200 kg ha −1 ) (Yagi et al, 1996). Lower CH 4 emission from Indian rice paddies compared to that of other countries could be due to 1) lower soil organic C status, 2) high percolation rate of sandy loam soils, which allows to leach substantial amount of DOC to lower soil profiles, 3) lower yield of rice with smaller rhizodeposition and 4) limited amount of organic residue recycling in soil.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 58%
“…of measurements all over India Matthews et al (2000c) 2.1 Using the MERES simulation model Gupta et al (2002) 5.0 Using CH 4 emission coefficients based on water regime and soil organic C Yan et al (2003) 5.9 Using the region specific emission factors IINC (2004) 4.1 Using the IPCC methodology and IPCC default CH 4 emission coefficients Bhatia et al (2004) 2.9 Using the IPCC methodology and measured CH 4 emission coefficients This study 1.5 Using the validated DNDC model and newly compiled soil, rice area and weather data base tically reduced CH 4 fluxes. The intermittent flooding approach has been applied in many Asian countries such as India (Jain et al, 2000;Adhya et al, 2000), Philippines (Corton et al, 2000), China , and Japan (Yagi et al, 1996) to reduce CH 4 emissions. With continuous flooding N 2 O emission ranged from 0.04 to 0.05 Tg N yr −1 (Table 4) The simulated spatial distribution of GHG emissions from Indian rice fields and their GWP under continuous flooding condition is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Scaling Up Ghg Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6d) were inconsistent with other studies that NO − 3 has either increase or no effect on CH 4 uptake (Dunfield et al, 1995;Corton et al, 2000). In general, soil nitrification consumes soil NH (King and Schnell, 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Soil Mineral N On Soil Ch 4 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In the 2002 fields, CH 4 fluxes tended to decrease with increasing urea application ( Corton et al, 2000;Sass et al, 1992;Wassmann et al, 2000;Yagi et al, 1996;Zheng et al, 2000]. Under continuous flooding, some recognizable CH 4 flushes was observed over the whole season, particularly when crop residues were incorporated ( Figure 1a).…”
Section: Seasonmentioning
confidence: 98%