2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methane emission from rice fields as affected by land use change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coincidence of CH 4 emission and abundance of methanogens is intriguing, albeit CH 4 emission is also influenced by bacterial CH 4 oxidation (Krüger et al ., ; Ma and Lu, ). In contrast to our observations, it was previously suggested that the methanogenic community can recover after periods of upland crop cultivation (Eusufzai et al ., ). However, our observations are consistent with reports of lower numbers of resident and active archaea in drained versus flooded rice fields in Japan (Itoh et al ., ) and with decreasing numbers of methanogens in Chinese fields during a rice–soybean rotation, which never recovered to the level of the control rice fields without rotation (Liu et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The coincidence of CH 4 emission and abundance of methanogens is intriguing, albeit CH 4 emission is also influenced by bacterial CH 4 oxidation (Krüger et al ., ; Ma and Lu, ). In contrast to our observations, it was previously suggested that the methanogenic community can recover after periods of upland crop cultivation (Eusufzai et al ., ). However, our observations are consistent with reports of lower numbers of resident and active archaea in drained versus flooded rice fields in Japan (Itoh et al ., ) and with decreasing numbers of methanogens in Chinese fields during a rice–soybean rotation, which never recovered to the level of the control rice fields without rotation (Liu et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, anaerobic conditions in the paddy plots limited nitrate availability, and anaerobiosis favored denitrification to N 2 (Zou et al 2007), thus leading to the lower N 2 O emissions. However, in newly converted upland orchard, the regeneration of oxidants, in particular re-oxidation of Fe(II), thus contributes to the uptake of CH 4 (Eusufzai et al 2010). Meanwhile, N 2 O emissions were generally higher in optimum soil moisture and N supply as a result of tight coupling between nitrification and denitrification (Snyder et al 2009).…”
Section: Effects Of Land Use Conversion On Soil Ch 4 and N 2 O Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least partially, this could explain why rice straw application resulted in high CH4 emissions in CP than RP. Apart from the source of extra electron donor (i.e., rice straw), high CH4 emission from CP was caused by the availability of organic carbon (due to continuous rice cultivation), highly reduced condition (i.e., higher Fe (II) concentration) and abundance of methanogens (Eusufzai et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such changes are found to have large effects on the CH4 emissions (Kumagai and Konno, 1998;Nishimura et al, 2004). Recently, we demonstrated that the CH4 emission dynamics in continuous-and recently-converted paddy fields differed due to the abundance of electron donor (soil organic matter), microbially reducible Fe (III) content and activity of methanogenic archaea (Eusufzai et al, 2010). Thus, one may postulate that application of rice straw to these fields may serve as an exogenous source of electron donor for Fe (III) reduction and methanogens, which eventually would enhance CH4 emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%