Methane Oxidation and the Competition for Oxygen in the Rice Rhizosphere

Abstract

A mechanistic approach is presented to describe oxidation of the greenhouse gas methane in the rice rhizosphere of flooded paddies by obligate methanotrophic bacteria. In flooded rice paddies these methanotrophs compete for available O 2 with other types of bacteria. Soil incubation studies and most-probablenumber (MPN) counts of oxygen consumers show that microbial oxygen consumption rates were dominated by heterotrophic and methanotrophic respiration. MPN counts of methanotrophs showed large spatial and temporal variability. The most abundant methanotrophs (a Methylocystis sp.) and heterotrophs (a Pseudomonas sp. and a Rhodococcus sp.) were isolated and characterized. Growth dynamics of these bacteria under carbon and oxygen limitations are presented. Theoretical calculations based on measured growth dynamics show that methanotrophs were only able to outcompete heterotrophs at low oxygen concentrations (frequently <5 M). The oxygen concentration at which methanotrophs won the competition from heterotrophs did not depend on methane concentration, but it was highly affected by organic carbon concentrations in the paddy soil. Methane oxidation was severely inhibited at high acetate concentrations. This is in accordance with competition experiments between Pseudomonas spp. and Methylocystis spp. carried out at different oxygen and carbon concentrations. Likely, methane oxidation mainly occurs at microaerophilic and low-acetate conditions and thus not directly at the root surface. Acetate and oxygen concentrations in the rice rhizosphere are in the critical range for methane oxidation, and a high variability in methane oxidation rates is thus expected.Rice paddies are an important source of the greenhouse gas methane (33). The magnitude of methane emission from rice paddies reflects the balance between methanogenesis and methanotrophy. Methane oxidation occurs at anaerobic-aerobic interfaces with available oxygen and methane: the soilwater interface and the rice rhizosphere. At the soil-water interface, methane oxidation efficiencies are fairly constant at 70 to 95% of the transported methane (21, 25). Estimates of methane oxidation in the rice rhizosphere are much more variable. They range from 7 to 90% of the transported methane (17,21,25,32) and still vary from 7 to 52% if only data obtained from specific inhibitor studies are included. A better mechanistic understanding of rice rhizospheric methane oxidation is important to be able predict methane emissions from rice paddies.Obligate methanotrophic microorganisms carry out methane oxidation. In freshwater wetlands, high-affinity methanotrophy (3) does not have to be considered due to the high methane concentrations (53) and neither does anaerobic methane oxidation (60). Nitrifiers are also of little importance to methane oxidation in the rice rhizosphere (7). Methanotrophic activity is thus determined by oxygen and methane concentrations. Methanotrophs in the rice rhizosphere do not have to compete for methane with microbial or chemical competitors, although th...

Methanotrophic bacteria in oilsands tailings ponds of northern Alberta

“…Nitrogen is not limited in the ponds, in fact some nitrifying bacteria were detected (Supplementary Figure S2). However, the high ammonia/ammonium concentrations up to 17 mg l À 1 should require that methanotrophic species have mechanisms to deal with the toxic byproducts of ammonia oxidation by pMMO (Stein and Klotz, 2011 (Amaral and Knowles, 1995;Henckel et al, 1999;Henckel et al, 2000, van Bodegom et al, 2001Horz et al, 2002;Pester et al, 2004;Bussmann et al, 2006). Methane and O 2 levels certainly affect methanotroph communities, but the effect is probably sitespecific and difficult to generalize.…”

A New Rate Law Describing Microbial Respiration

“…Microbiologists have in recent years expended considerable effort in investigating microbial respiration rates under specific conditions (22,33,36,41).…”

Strategies to Optimize Microbially-Mediated Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Landfill Cover Soils

“…Utilization of methane was modeled with Michaelis-Menten kinetics and methane was considered to be the sole growth limiting substrate. Despite its poor solubility in water (Fry et al, 1995) and low half saturation constant (van Bodegom et al, 2001) comparable to those of methane, oxygen was not considered to be a growth limiting factor in our model due to its abundance in the atmospheric air. With these assumptions, a differential equation was developed describing mass transfer across the biofilm surrounding a spherical packing material.…”