1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-2728(99)00064-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanol modification of the electron paramagnetic resonance signals from the S0 and S2 states of the water-oxidizing complex of Photosystem II

Abstract: The Mn-derived electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) multiline signal from the S(0) state of the water-oxidizing complex is observable only in the presence methanol. In the present study, we have characterized the effect of methanol on the EPR signals from the S(0) and S(2) states as well as on the EPR Signal II(slow) originating from the Tyrosine(D)(ox) radical. The amplitudes of the S(0) and S(2) multiline signals increase with the methanol concentration in a similar way, whereas the S(2) g=4.1 excited state… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports showed that methanol concentrations up to 10% (v/v; 2.5 M) do not affect the oxygen-evolution rates (Bernat et al 2002;Deak et al 1999;Force et al 1998), while at 20% (v/v; 5 M) a small, reversible decline was reported (Force et al 1998). The data in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports showed that methanol concentrations up to 10% (v/v; 2.5 M) do not affect the oxygen-evolution rates (Bernat et al 2002;Deak et al 1999;Force et al 1998), while at 20% (v/v; 5 M) a small, reversible decline was reported (Force et al 1998). The data in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In such experiments suspensions of PSII samples are illuminated for about 1 min with strong white light in the presence of artificial electron acceptors. These kinds of measurements have been performed by several groups and consistently did not reveal any inhibitory effects of methanol at concentrations of up to 5-10% (v/v) (Bernat et al 2002;Deak et al 1999;Force et al 1998). This finding raises the question as to whether or not methanol really acts as substrate analog in PSII.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Small changes in the electronic coupling between the radical and the metal and/or changes in the relaxation properties could lead to a loss of the characteristic form of the signal. This is not unprecedented in this system; indeed, significant solvent-induced changes in the EPR properties of relevant species in PSII have been reported previously (Å hrling et al 1997;Deák et al 1999;Force et al 1998;Messinger et al 1997). Specific experiments are required to test the whether Tyr Z • is responsible for the high-quantum efficiency fraction of terminal electron donors.…”
Section: Quantum Efficiency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is well known that methanol can interact with the Mn-cluster and significantly modify its EPR signals in different S states (Messinger et al 1997;Force et al 1998;Deak et al 1999;Su et al 2006;Å hrling et al 2006;Haddy 2007). Methanol can also affect the EPR signals arising from the magnetic interaction between Tyr Z • and the Mn-cluster in various S states .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%