2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.03.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methanol oxidation on titanium-supported nano-scale Ni flakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the bare Co 3 O 4 ‐modified electrode displays onset potentials of 0.45 and 0.42 V (vs. Hg/HgO) for methanol and ethanol oxidation, respectively (Figure C,D). Interestingly, the observed onset potential for the proposed GO/Co 3 O 4 /racks‐GC catalyst is much lower than those of electrodes fabricated using NiCo 2 O 4 /SS Co 3 O 4 /NiO, NiCo 2 O 4 –RGO, NiCo 2 O 4 nanostructures, and Co 3 O 4 , NiO, titanium/Ni nanoflakes, and NiO@multiwalled carbon nanotubes . The superior electroactivity for ethanol and methanol electrooxidation in terms of lower onset potential and remarkable current density of porous GO/Co 3 O 4 racks compared with GO/Co 3 O 4 blocks indicates the effective role of dense Co 3+ sites along densely exposed {112} or {112}/{111} facets and hierarchically nonstacked sheet racks in ethanol and methanol oxidation.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of Sheet Racks and Blocks For Methmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the bare Co 3 O 4 ‐modified electrode displays onset potentials of 0.45 and 0.42 V (vs. Hg/HgO) for methanol and ethanol oxidation, respectively (Figure C,D). Interestingly, the observed onset potential for the proposed GO/Co 3 O 4 /racks‐GC catalyst is much lower than those of electrodes fabricated using NiCo 2 O 4 /SS Co 3 O 4 /NiO, NiCo 2 O 4 –RGO, NiCo 2 O 4 nanostructures, and Co 3 O 4 , NiO, titanium/Ni nanoflakes, and NiO@multiwalled carbon nanotubes . The superior electroactivity for ethanol and methanol electrooxidation in terms of lower onset potential and remarkable current density of porous GO/Co 3 O 4 racks compared with GO/Co 3 O 4 blocks indicates the effective role of dense Co 3+ sites along densely exposed {112} or {112}/{111} facets and hierarchically nonstacked sheet racks in ethanol and methanol oxidation.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of Sheet Racks and Blocks For Methmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ni [7][8][9][10] and Nibased alloys reported to date, such as NiCu [11][12][13][14], NiFe [15], NiCo [16], NiMn [17] and NiTi [18,19] show excellent catalytic activities, but even in alkaline electrolytes, they lack of a satisfactory durability.…”
Section: Nimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Given Se, O, and S elements are in the same family with similar 60 properties, we may suggest that NiSe/Ni electrode shares similar methanol oxidation mechanism with nickel oxide or sulfide. 29,30 Note that the NiSe/Ni electrode also outperforms some previously reported catalysts including NiCo 2 O 4 , 19 NiCo 2 S x , 29 titaniumsupported nano-scale Ni flakes, 31 and NiO/multi-walled carbon 65 nanotubes composites. 32 The high electro-catalytic activity of NiSe/Ni could be attributed to the following four reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%