1970
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(70)86264-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methionine Hydroxy Analog: Varying Levels for Lactating Cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Four treatment groups were found to be outliers based on this screening criterion (Polan et al, 1970;Hansen et al, 1991;Girard et al, 2005;Lara et al, 2006; Table 2). Two of these treatment groups were supplemented with HMTBa, 1 was supplemented with Smartamine, and 1 was supplemented with Mepron.…”
Section: Database Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four treatment groups were found to be outliers based on this screening criterion (Polan et al, 1970;Hansen et al, 1991;Girard et al, 2005;Lara et al, 2006; Table 2). Two of these treatment groups were supplemented with HMTBa, 1 was supplemented with Smartamine, and 1 was supplemented with Mepron.…”
Section: Database Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported effects of HMTBA provision on milk production and composition are variable (Polan et al, 1970;Piepenbrink et al, 2004;St-Pierre and Sylvester, 2005). Such variation may reflect differences in the amount absorbed or the responsiveness of the cows to additional Met.…”
Section: Whole Bodymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydroxy analog of methionine, 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoate (HMTBA), has long been proposed as a means to provide Met and increase milk and protein yields of dairy cows fed rations limited in Met (Polan et al, 1970). The analog HMTBA is more resistant to rumen microbial degradation than l-Met (Belasco, 1972), but estimations of postrumen availability of HMTBA vary greatly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), mais aussi, beaucoup moins fréquemment toutefois, sur la quantité de lait produite (Bishop, 1971;Stanley & Toma, 1977;Jenny et al, 1980). Ces effets ont cependant été assez souvent nuls (Burgos & Oison, 1970;Wallenius & Whitchurch, 1975) et parfois négatifs (Polan et al, 1970;Laurent & Vignon, 1972 (Chalupa, 1975 (Lundquist et aL, 1982 (Rémond, 1988). Cela montre une absorption intestinale au moins partielle de la mé-thionine distribuée puisque Schwab et al (1988) (Casper et al, 1987;Illg et al, 1987; (Williams ei al., 1970;Papas et al, 1984a et b;Yang et al, 1986;Rémond, 1988), aucune modification du taux protéique du lait ou des quantités de lait ou de protéines produites n'a été enregistrée.…”
unclassified