1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(94)85086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method comparison for the determination of labile aluminium species in natural waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water samples from three reservoirs, Cixerri, Simbirizzi, and Bau Pressiu, and their respective treatment plants were collected, respectively, on four, four, and "ve sampling dates over the October 1995}February 1996 period. Samples were collected in high-density polyethylene containers leached with 10% (v/v) nitric acid for 48 h (Fairman et al, 1994). The samples were brought to the laboratory immediately and the speciation procedure was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water samples from three reservoirs, Cixerri, Simbirizzi, and Bau Pressiu, and their respective treatment plants were collected, respectively, on four, four, and "ve sampling dates over the October 1995}February 1996 period. Samples were collected in high-density polyethylene containers leached with 10% (v/v) nitric acid for 48 h (Fairman et al, 1994). The samples were brought to the laboratory immediately and the speciation procedure was performed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In the present study, this method was adopted for determining free forms of aluminum in urine (labile monomeric ions). The modifications included that the ionic composition of the analytical column for fractionation be in the Na+ form instead of the H+ form; small samples were used for the ion-exchange procedure and a later analysis.…”
Section: Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several reports have been published comparing distinct and diverse methodologies, all of which seem to come to the conclusion that most of today's methods give an adequate and comparable estimation of what can be loosely called the "labile monomeric" or "toxic" aluminium fraction in waters [7,9]. The main reported drawback of all these method performance programs is the inevitable instability of any standard samples provided for the testing program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%