2015
DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2015.1048877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method Development and Validation for the Determination of Potential Impurities Present in Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide in Fixed Dose Combination Drug Product by Using Reverse Phase – Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Diode-Array Detector

Abstract: A simple, sensitive, and reproducible ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) method for the determination of nine known potential impurities present in Olmesartan medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide tablets in fixed dose combination drug product was developed. Chromatographic separation was achieved between impurities at satisfactory level using Acquity UPLC HSS T3, 100 mm length  2.1 mm id with 1.8 µm particle size column. Gradient elution mode was kept using mobile phase A as 0.1% orthophosphoric acid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained showed acceptable accuracy and precision of the assay, with no interference from the excipients present in the formulations. Further, Student's t ‐test and F ‐test were applied (at 95% confidence level) for the statistical comparison between the results obtained by applying the proposed SFC method for the binary combinations and reported methods (Bharathi, Hotha, Chatki, Satyanarayana, & Venkateswarlu, 2012; de Diego, Soto, & Mennickent, 2014; Deshmukh, Deo, Inam, & Lambat, 2018; Elgorashe, Idris, Abdelrahman, & Saeed, 2013; Gao et al, 2010; Kamble, Mahadik, Khatal, & Dhaneshwar, 2010; Karra, Pilli, Inamadugu, & Seshagiri Rao, 2012; Karvelis, Kalogria, & Panderi, 2014; Kolocouri, Dotsikas, Apostolou, Kousoulos, & Loukas, 2007; Özdemir & Akyüz, 2014; Rane, Sangshetti, & Shinde, 2008; Ravi, Inamadugu, Pilli, Sreenivasulu, & Ponneri, 2012; Shah, Parekh, et al, 2017; Srikanth, Murali, Vekaria, Rao, & Mantena, 2015; Tian, Tian, Tian, Wang, & Mo, 2008). The values found for both the test were less than the tabulated values, suggesting insignificant differences between the methods in terms of accuracy and precision (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained showed acceptable accuracy and precision of the assay, with no interference from the excipients present in the formulations. Further, Student's t ‐test and F ‐test were applied (at 95% confidence level) for the statistical comparison between the results obtained by applying the proposed SFC method for the binary combinations and reported methods (Bharathi, Hotha, Chatki, Satyanarayana, & Venkateswarlu, 2012; de Diego, Soto, & Mennickent, 2014; Deshmukh, Deo, Inam, & Lambat, 2018; Elgorashe, Idris, Abdelrahman, & Saeed, 2013; Gao et al, 2010; Kamble, Mahadik, Khatal, & Dhaneshwar, 2010; Karra, Pilli, Inamadugu, & Seshagiri Rao, 2012; Karvelis, Kalogria, & Panderi, 2014; Kolocouri, Dotsikas, Apostolou, Kousoulos, & Loukas, 2007; Özdemir & Akyüz, 2014; Rane, Sangshetti, & Shinde, 2008; Ravi, Inamadugu, Pilli, Sreenivasulu, & Ponneri, 2012; Shah, Parekh, et al, 2017; Srikanth, Murali, Vekaria, Rao, & Mantena, 2015; Tian, Tian, Tian, Wang, & Mo, 2008). The values found for both the test were less than the tabulated values, suggesting insignificant differences between the methods in terms of accuracy and precision (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Özdemir and Akyüz (2014) (combination 5), Bharathi, Hotha, Chatki, Satyanarayana, and Venkateswarlu (2012) (combination 6), Kolocouri, Dotsikas, Apostolou, Kousoulos, and Loukas (2007) (for combination 7), Srikanth et al (2015) (combination 8), Rane, Sangshetti, and Shinde (2008) (for combination 9), Tian, Tian, Tian, Wang, and Mo (2008) (for combination 10), Elgorashe, Idris, Abdelrahman, and Saeed (2013) (for combination 11),…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation