2012
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for developing national quality indicators based on manual data extraction from medical records

Abstract: Developing quality indicators (QI) for national purposes (eg, public disclosure, paying-for-performance) highlights the need to find accessible and reliable data sources for collecting standardised data. The most accurate and reliable data source for collecting clinical and organisational information still remains the medical record. Data collection from electronic medical records (EMR) would be far less burdensome than from paper medical records (PMR). However, the development of EMRs is costly and has suffer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The team’s main remit is to develop validated QIs for on behalf of the French healthcare authorities [23]. The task of developing QIs for SCPs was set by the French Ministry of Health and the National Authority for Health ( Haute Autorité de Santé - HAS) who commissioned the present study and officially exempted us from Ethics Committee approval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The team’s main remit is to develop validated QIs for on behalf of the French healthcare authorities [23]. The task of developing QIs for SCPs was set by the French Ministry of Health and the National Authority for Health ( Haute Autorité de Santé - HAS) who commissioned the present study and officially exempted us from Ethics Committee approval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QIs were codeveloped by COMPAQ-HPST, the French National Authority for Health, and the French College of Cardiology 15. Eligible patients had to have been hospitalised for more than 24 h in 2010 with a diagnosis of AMI (diagnosis codes I21 or I22 ICM-10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical records are an important tool for clinical care delivery, quality assessment and improvement 1–3. Properly maintained documentation of clinical encounters facilitates better continuation of care across time and providers, provides objective evidence through which to evaluate and monitor clinical practice, and serves as the basis for healthcare payment and reimbursement systems 4 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%