2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for Estimating System Stiffness for Excavation Support Walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Weight of the building (due to increasing of B while most part of the building still inside the PFW) is responsible for the cases in which an increase in B is followed by an increase in Uc. (2) Locating most part of the building (due to extension of the building width, B, beyond the PFS boundary) is responsible for the cases in which an increase in B has led to a decrease in Uc. In other words in the latter, that part of B, and its corresponding weight and stiffness, beyond the PFW has controlled and restricted horizontal movements of the excavation .…”
Section: Excavation Wall Horizontal Displacement (Uc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) Weight of the building (due to increasing of B while most part of the building still inside the PFW) is responsible for the cases in which an increase in B is followed by an increase in Uc. (2) Locating most part of the building (due to extension of the building width, B, beyond the PFS boundary) is responsible for the cases in which an increase in B has led to a decrease in Uc. In other words in the latter, that part of B, and its corresponding weight and stiffness, beyond the PFW has controlled and restricted horizontal movements of the excavation .…”
Section: Excavation Wall Horizontal Displacement (Uc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excavations inevitably induce significant changes in stress/strain states of the surrounding soil, which in turn may cause different levels of displacement and damage in nearby structures [1]. These effects are related to a host of parameters, namely, soil properties, specifications of excavation support system, building properties and location with respect to the excavation, and excavation sequences and geometry [2][3][4][5][6][7]. In design and construction of deep excavations, it is prudent to avoid excessive lateral displacements and ground surface settlements, by carefully considering the effects of the above-mentioned factors, otherwise uncertainties would often force engineers towards inefficient constructions with high costs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In der ingenieurpraktischen Anwendung werden Schlitzwände in räumlichen Finite‐Elemente‐Berechnungen häufig vereinfachend mit linear‐elastischem Materialverhalten und mit durchgehenden Strukturelementen unter Ansatz isotroper Elastizitätsmoduln des Betons diskretisiert (u. a. ). Bei der Untersuchung des Verformungsverhaltens von Baugruben mit räumlichen numerischen Modellen stellt sich indes die Frage, inwieweit die bei Schlitzwänden in Form der Schlitzwandfugen vorhandenen Diskontinuitäten bei der Modellbildung zu berücksichtigen sind.…”
Section: Bestehende Ansätze Zur Abbildung Von Schlitzwänden In Räumliunclassified
“…Besides, no external loads were considered in the model. Plate structural elements (linear elastic) were used to model the diaphragm walls, which were considered wished in place (Bryson, Zapata 2012). A compressive strength f ck = 30 MPa, a Poisson ratio  = 0.2, and a specific weight of 24 kN/m 3 were considered for the concrete of both layers.…”
Section: Materials and Model Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%