2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for investigating intradriver heterogeneity using vehicle trajectory data: A Dynamic Time Warping approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where p (1) k ∈ R 2 and p (2) k ∈ R 2 are the position of two vehicles in the driving encounter at discrete time t k (Fig. 3), K ∈ N is the length of the driving encounter x.…”
Section: A Driving Encountermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p (1) k ∈ R 2 and p (2) k ∈ R 2 are the position of two vehicles in the driving encounter at discrete time t k (Fig. 3), K ∈ N is the length of the driving encounter x.…”
Section: A Driving Encountermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distance matrix is called the "local cost matrix" for the alignment of the sequences and [59]. Then, we calculate the cumulative cost matrix ( ), an × matrix that stores the cumulative smallest cost required to arrive at each element in the matrix by following an express command from (1, 1) to ( , ) [60,61]. Each element of is calculated using (1), which also identifies the search direction.…”
Section: Conventional Dtw Algorithm and Its Application Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-driver variability accounts for a significant proportion of deviations between simulated and empirical trajectories (Kesting and Treiber, 2009). We have developed enhanced Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) for calibrating synthetic trajectories from Newell's car following model that can reflect intra-driver heterogeneity (Taylor et al, 2015). Similar methods have been used successfully to generate link driving schedules compatible to be used with MOVES 2010 (Aziz and Ukkusuri, 2015).…”
Section: Day-to-day Emission Dynamics In a Work Zone Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%