2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10921-016-0379-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for Removing Secondary Peaks in Remote Field Eddy Current Testing of Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In simulations, the frequency of the exciting signal was 20 Hz, the pipe inner diameter was 157.1 × 10 −3 m, the pipe thickness was 10.36 × 10 −3 m, the simulation model was 2D axisymmetric, and the parameters of the exciting coil and receiving coil were set as the same as previously introduced in [ 22 , 23 ]. According to Table 1 , when the product value of the pipe permeability and conductivity remains constant (point E), different couples of permeability and conductivity have different simulation results (such as the simulating phase in Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In simulations, the frequency of the exciting signal was 20 Hz, the pipe inner diameter was 157.1 × 10 −3 m, the pipe thickness was 10.36 × 10 −3 m, the simulation model was 2D axisymmetric, and the parameters of the exciting coil and receiving coil were set as the same as previously introduced in [ 22 , 23 ]. According to Table 1 , when the product value of the pipe permeability and conductivity remains constant (point E), different couples of permeability and conductivity have different simulation results (such as the simulating phase in Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concentrated on applying RFECT in practical ferromagnetic pipes testing. As such, the authors have worked out a method for removing secondary peaks in practical RFECT of ferromagnetic pipes [ 22 ] and have investigated array RFECT and pulsed RFECT of ferromagnetic pipes [ 23 , 24 ]. By combining the authors’ previous studies, this paper studies a method for quantifying wall thickness in RFECT of ferromagnetic pipes based on the linear function that was introduced before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transmitting-receiving distance (TRD), which is also termed as the source distance, was ignored. In [16]- [18], the TRD effect was investigated using finite element analysis in a remote field pulsed eddycurrent system. It was shown that the thickness of a metal pipe can be determined using the zero-crossing time method as well as through the phase shifting of the attenuated responses with respect to the TRD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to establish evaluation techniques to monitor the health of dielectric pipes and pipeline coatings at early stages. Various approaches based on nondestructive detection (NDE) have been proposed to detect damage in pipes, including eddy currents [4][5][6], guided waves [7], ultrasonic techniques [8,9], magnetic flux leakage [10,11], electromagnetic acoustic transducers [12], and endoscopic approaches using various kinds of sensors (e.g. optical cameras and lasers) to detect pipelines with the available internal volume [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%