1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.46.2452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for spatially resolved imaging of energy-dependent photoelectron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned previously, in Auger emission applications, the electron source is within atomic distances of the object, while in LEEPS microscopy the electron source is at a large distance from the atomic cluster. It has also been shown that multiple scattering does tend to obscure images in some LEED applications, and that improvements can be made in reconstructing the holograms [21,22]. Images in some LEED applications are also obscured by``twin'' images, which are virtually not present in LEEPS images due to the large distances from source to object.…”
Section: Multiple Scattering In Leed Vs Leepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned previously, in Auger emission applications, the electron source is within atomic distances of the object, while in LEEPS microscopy the electron source is at a large distance from the atomic cluster. It has also been shown that multiple scattering does tend to obscure images in some LEED applications, and that improvements can be made in reconstructing the holograms [21,22]. Images in some LEED applications are also obscured by``twin'' images, which are virtually not present in LEEPS images due to the large distances from source to object.…”
Section: Multiple Scattering In Leed Vs Leepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images in some LEED applications are also obscured by``twin'' images, which are virtually not present in LEEPS images due to the large distances from source to object. It was shown that by energy averaging [21], and averaging over the angle of collection [22] the e ects of multiple scattering on reconstructed images could be signi®cantly reduced. That is, the quality of the images were improved by averaging holograms of di erent energies and screen positions, respectively.…”
Section: Multiple Scattering In Leed Vs Leepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By applying of multiple-energy reconstruction methods, 6,7 the twin image problems can be overcome. As it was predicted theoretically, [11][12][13] for a certain combination of the atomic distances and the k-vector values the overlapping of the real and twin images may lead to a suppression ͑enhancement͒ of the atomic images in the hologram reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A considerable improvement of the real-space reconstruction quality is gained if the holograms are acquired for several different energies and if the multiple-energy reconstruction methods are applied. 6,7 One of the main advantages of multipleenergy measurements is the elimination of the twin images, which can hinder the proper determination of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is like using a meter stick to measure the distances of atoms d/, but the origin of the meter stick is at unknown positions dy. The presence of object-wave interference peaks [20] (i.e., artifacts) occurs because the condition that the reference wave is large compared to the object wave is not satisfied for /yv since an adatom's scattering factor is usually smaller than that of the substrate atoms, i.e., l/o"l < \fs~\' In addition, there are artifacts generated by multiple scattering [5][6][7][8]. Therefore, direct inversion of LEED or LEPD integral-order I-V spectra, as proposed in previous studies [11], is not a useful approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%