2013
DOI: 10.1080/01446193.2013.783705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for testing proximity detection and alert technology for safe construction equipment operation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research [30,31] has developed preliminary testing methods to evaluate various proximity warning systems for prevention of collision accidents. In this paper, we designed the experimental methods based on these test methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past research [30,31] has developed preliminary testing methods to evaluate various proximity warning systems for prevention of collision accidents. In this paper, we designed the experimental methods based on these test methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a field test, they demonstrated that this system could be used to prevent collision accidents on construction sites. Marks and Teizer [30] presented a testing method and demonstrated its ability to evaluate the reliability and effectiveness of RF-based proximity warning systems in construction environments. Similarly, Choe et al [31] proposed a method to evaluate ultrasonic and radar-based warning technologies.…”
Section: Review Of Proximity Warning Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other preventive methods are based on techniques implementing proximity detection and pro-active warning systems -a method that alerts workers in advance before entering a blind spot or getting too close the operating equipmentrelated hazards. In particular, technologies based on magnetic signals show promising results in being effective in providing alerts to equipment operator and ground workers when hazardous proximity situations occur between them [10][11].…”
Section: Hazardous Proximity Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple other technologies have been studied and evaluated including vision cameras [12][13], radio detection and ranging (RADAR) [14], radio-frequencyidentification (RFID) [11,[15][16], ultra wideband (UWB) [17][18], range imaging cameras [19][20][21], and global positioning system (GPS) [22][23] for potential deployment in the construction environment. Although some of these systems were capable of detecting and alerting workers in real-time of hazards, many are infrastructure-heavy as they require expensive setup of sensing infrastructure.…”
Section: Hazardous Proximity Situationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the construction sector had the largest number of fatal workplace injuries (805 out of 4,628 total fatalities) in 2012 [2]. Aside from causing human tragedy and economic loss, such accidents signi cantly a ect the productivity and reputation of the construction industry [3,4]. Therefore, minimizing accidents is a major issue that the industry must solve [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%