2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b06433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for the Calculation of the Hamaker Constants of Organic Materials by the Lifshitz Macroscopic Approach with Density Functional Theory

Abstract: The Hamaker constants, which are coefficients providing quantitative information on intermolecular forces, were calculated for a number of different materials according to the Lifshitz theory via simple DFT calculations without any experimental measurements being performed. The physical properties (polarizability, dipole moment, molecular volume, and vibrational frequency) of organic molecules were calculated using the B3LYP density functional and the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. Values for the Hamaker constants wer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have not performed separate calculations of α el . Firstprinciples and machine-learning studies for (mostly) smaller molecules than those studied in this paper suggest that performing electronic polarizability calculations with a sufficient accuracy could soon be within reach [55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Instead, we will use for all materials a value of n = 1.7, independent of the mode frequency, so r,∞ = n 2 = 2.89.…”
Section: A Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not performed separate calculations of α el . Firstprinciples and machine-learning studies for (mostly) smaller molecules than those studied in this paper suggest that performing electronic polarizability calculations with a sufficient accuracy could soon be within reach [55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. Instead, we will use for all materials a value of n = 1.7, independent of the mode frequency, so r,∞ = n 2 = 2.89.…”
Section: A Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choice of exchange-correlation potentials DFT predictions are known to critically depend on the choice of exchange-correlation potentials. [2,3,27] Because we are dealing with the adsorption of a monolayer of water molecules, chemisorption would be dominant, so we did not consider dispersion interactions [28] when employing GGA-PBE for the exchange-correlation potential. However, correcting for dispersion interactions [29,30] may affect the present results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulating the wettability of surfaces [1][2][3] is an important issue that must be addressed to broaden their industrial applications, such as heterogeneous catalysis, corrosion, and electrochemistry. [1,4,5] The wettability of the surfaces of metal catalysts such as Cu has a significant effect on their catalytic activity for electrochemical reactions, [6] wherein the receding contact angle of water on the metal surface corresponds to the oxygen reduction reactions of the catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using this equation, we calculated A for several representative systems. For the Hamaker constants of the materials used for the calculations, we employed the literature values [20][21][22][23][24][25]. We chose Si 3 N 4 , HfO 2 , and ZrO 2 as representative of high-k dielectrics, and silsesquioxanes and allyl ethers as representative of low-k dielectrics.…”
Section: Deposition Selectivity ≡ Number O F Chips Deposited In Pockementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose Si 3 N 4 , HfO 2 , and ZrO 2 as representative of high-k dielectrics, and silsesquioxanes and allyl ethers as representative of low-k dielectrics. Because we could not find a value of the Hamaker constants of silsesquioxanes, we assumed it as 5.5 × 10 −20 J deduced from the values of 5.5 × 10 −20 J and 5.4 × 10 −20 J for disiloxane and hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane, respectively [25]. Similarly, we assumed the representative Hamaker constant of allyl ethers as 4.5 × 10 −20 J from the values of 4.1 × 10 −20 J and 4.9 × 10 −20 J for dipropyl ether and allyl acetate, respectively [25].…”
Section: Deposition Selectivity ≡ Number O F Chips Deposited In Pockementioning
confidence: 99%