2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method for the evaluation of the reorganization energy of electron transfer reactions in water–methanol mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often attributed to changes in the geometry of the individual molecules and the polarization of the surrounding medium. [34][35][36][37] Recent theoretical calculations have demonstrated that the polarization contribution to reorganization energy is negligible for organic solids.…”
Section: Reorganization Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often attributed to changes in the geometry of the individual molecules and the polarization of the surrounding medium. [34][35][36][37] Recent theoretical calculations have demonstrated that the polarization contribution to reorganization energy is negligible for organic solids.…”
Section: Reorganization Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of solvent reorganization on the composition of various mixed solvents was thoroughly investigated for a number of homogeneous ET reactions in works. The authors put primary attention on the analysis of the Pekar factor as a function of the solution composition (this dependence can be both linear and nonlinear) and concluded that preferential solvation crucially affects the solvent reorganization. The nonlinear dependence of λ s in aqueous solutions on the concentration of cosolvent discussed in ref looks qualitatively similar to that suggested by us (see eq ).…”
Section: Model and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redox reactions at the interface of an active protein to water might be another example of systems, where nonlinear effects (nongauss fluctuations of solvent molecules) take place . Nevertheless, the solvent reorganization energy still remains a convenient and commonly adopted language to describe the Franck–Condon barrier in homogeneous electron-transfer reactions in mixed solvents. It is important to note that in this work we are interested first of all in addressing the qualitative behavior of the solvent reorganization energy as a function of the EG content in solutions; this justifies to some extent the simplified approach used to estimate the λ s values (eqs , ).…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because solvent reorganization energy is an important parameter in the above-mentioned calculations, it is therefore worth it to go beyond simplified continuum approaches and to describe a possible “static” solvent effect in water–EG solutions at the reduction of S 2 O 8 2– at atomistic level. The dependence of solvent reorganization on the composition of various mixed solvents in the regime of homogeneous ET mixed solvents was thoroughly investigated for a number of redox couples in works. This quantity was extracted from experimental rate constants as well as estimated using model calculations. The authors put primary attention on the analysis of the Pekar factor as a function of the solution composition (this dependence can be both linear and nonlinear) and concluded that preferential solvation crucially affects the solvent reorganization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%