Method Matters: An Empirical Study of Impact in Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

A major thrust of cognitive neuroscience is the elucidation of structure-function relationships in the human brain. Over the last several years, functional neuroimaging has risen in prominence relative to the lesion studies that formed the historical core of work in this field. These two methods have different strengths and weaknesses. Among these is a crucial difference in the nature of evidence each can provide. Lesion studies can provide evidence for necessity claims, whereas functional neuroimaging studies do not. We hypothesized that lesion studies will continue to have greater scientific impact even as the relative proportion of such studies in the cognitive neuroscience literature declines. Using methods drawn from systematic literature review, we identified a set of original cognitive neuroscience articles that employed either functional imaging or lesion techniques, published at one of two time points in the 1990s, and assessed the effect of the method used on each article's impact across the decade. Functional neuroimaging studies were cited three times more often than lesion studies throughout the time span we examined. This effect was in large part due to differences in the influence of the journals publishing the two methods; functional neuroimaging studies appeared disproportionately more often in higher impact journals. There were also differences in the degree to which articles using one method cited articles using the other method. Functional neuroimaging articles were less likely to include such cross-method citations.

A Bibliometric Review of Research Trends in Neuroimaging

“…Also, there might exist erroneous or missing data in the database that we would not be able to identify and rectify. Nonetheless, this study is useful as a reference for research evaluation by reviewers, hiring managers and grant panels 26 .…”

The Human Striatum is Necessary for Responding to Changes in Stimulus Relevance

“…Evidence from functional imaging data, however, is correlative in nature (Fellows et al, 2005) and does not provide evidence regarding the necessity of the BG in concrete stimulus-based switching. Therefore, we set out to examine these two aspects of cognitive flexibility in patients with focal striatal lesions, using the same task as that employed in the fMRI study (Cools et al, 2004).…”

Restoring Cerebral Blood Flow Reveals Neural Regions Critical for Naming

“…However, some areas of activation may not be essential to the task. Thus, it is commonly held that lesion studies and functional imaging studies should be complementary (Chatterjee, 2005;Fellows et al, 2005;Muller and Knight, 2006). That is, functional imaging can reveal all brain regions engaged in a task, and lesions to each area can determine whether or not each area is essential to the task.…”