2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-020-01719-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method on water level ruler reading recognition based on image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy at night was lower but varied less. Various methods show accuracies of about 1 cm [19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, these methods use a staff gauge to create a strong contrast between the water surface and the stream wall, as well as to serve as a reference for measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy at night was lower but varied less. Various methods show accuracies of about 1 cm [19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, these methods use a staff gauge to create a strong contrast between the water surface and the stream wall, as well as to serve as a reference for measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [22] proposed to improve the waterline detection accuracy by identifying the characters on the staff gauge image through a neural network. Image recognition with a staff gauge is also used in [23,24], obtaining a measurement error of 0.9 cm. Some image-based water level measurement systems do not use staff gauges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In large-scale visual sensing, the cost may too high to set up the water level ruler for most of the cameras [17,18]. Furthermore, it is also difficult to find a consistent and common object as a reference ruler in all scenes.…”
Section: ) Universal Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional flood sensing models employ landmarks and rule-marks as reference objects to identify the flood extent boundaries by computing the edge and segments; however, this process is labor-intensive and time-consuming for a national-scale application [12,16]. Although certain methods can automatically compute the intersections of the flood marks, site-specific calibration and measurements must be realized and, thus, the application of these approaches to numerous cameras is challenging [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The camera-based systems are mostly based on a single optical camera, monitoring staff gauge but differing in image processing techniques for detecting water line on the staff and its conversion to water level. The technique is subject to poor visibility due to weather condition, ambient noise and image distortions (e.g., Chen et al, 2021;Kuo & Tai, 2022;Lin et al, 2018). Zhang et al (2019) and Azevedo and Brás (2021) developed monitoring systems using a single infrared camera to mitigate the visibility issue and image quality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%