2011
DOI: 10.1116/1.3645599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to compensate radiation-induced errors in a hot-cathode-ionization gauge with correcting electrode

Abstract: A previous method to compensate radiation-induced errors caused by the synchrotron radiation environment used a hot-cathode-ionization gauge with correcting electrode and shield tube. This compensating method was based on an approximate formula, and the compensated pressure measurement displayed large errors for pressures below ∼10−7 Pa. To overcome this problem, a new method, based on an exact formula, and use of precision electrometers, has now been developed and tested in a simulation experiment with excess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10, CE is the proportionality constant for radiation-induced current between the correcting electrode cable and its reference cable, I CErr (A) is the detected current in the reference cable, C is the proportionality constant for radiation-induced current between the collector cable and its reference cable, and I Crr (A) is the detected current in the reference cable, S CE (1/Pa) is the sensitivity of the correcting electrode, shown in Ref. 5. An "emission current" I CEe (A) measured at the grid of the correcting electrode, due to the influx of electrons originating from the external environment and the primary gauge filament, although described by mistake in Ref.…”
Section: Precise Methods Of Compensating Radiation-induced Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10, CE is the proportionality constant for radiation-induced current between the correcting electrode cable and its reference cable, I CErr (A) is the detected current in the reference cable, C is the proportionality constant for radiation-induced current between the collector cable and its reference cable, and I Crr (A) is the detected current in the reference cable, S CE (1/Pa) is the sensitivity of the correcting electrode, shown in Ref. 5. An "emission current" I CEe (A) measured at the grid of the correcting electrode, due to the influx of electrons originating from the external environment and the primary gauge filament, although described by mistake in Ref.…”
Section: Precise Methods Of Compensating Radiation-induced Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] In simulation experiments with excess electrons and with actual synchrotron radiation, the method could displayed the resulting pressure with a pressure measurement error of less than 22 %. [3,4,9] However the method based on an approximate formula was restricted to use in a specific pressure range, related to the influx of photoelectrons, and displayed large errors for pressures below 8 10 -8 Pa. [3,9] Furthermore to solve these problems, a precise method [5] based on an exact formula, was developed without use of the shield tube and the existing vacuum-gauge controller together with the automated-pressure-compensating circuit. In an experiment with excess electrons simulating a synchrotron radiation environment in the SPring-8 storage ring, this precise method without the vacuum-gauge cable could obtain the actual pressure with a pressure-measurement error less than several percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14.7, measurements of the current due to externally-produced electrons are made at the correcting electrode in an auxilliary gauge which does not contain a thermionic emitter filament, and these measurements, applied to the current measurement from the normal gauge, can be used to make corrections to the measured ion current and calculated pressure. The details of this are dealt with in a recent paper [28], and background information will be found in earlier papers [29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Figure 14.7 shows the side view of the gauge design and its logic.…”
Section: Bayard-alpert Ionization Gauge With Corrections For Externalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The measurement of I CEe , the external electron current received by the grid (and hence available within the gauge structure for ionization of gases), is also employed to make corrections to the measured ion current in the normal gauge. Reference [28] gives a formula to measure a compensated pressure in this gauge. Figure 14.7 shows the measurements of the uncorrected gauge, BA-S4, compared to measurements of the corrected gauge, BA-S4.…”
Section: Bayard-alpert Ionization Gauge With Corrections For Externalmentioning
confidence: 99%