2012
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2011.0102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to detect malfunctioning traffic count stations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The historical consistency correction method corrects the error based on past historical traffic volume. But there are limits to this method as past historical traffic volume is not always available such as when traffic patterns change due to traffic accidents or new road construction [9]. The network consistency method requires accurate actual traffic volume information from the main line or ramp, but this can be difficult to collect [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The historical consistency correction method corrects the error based on past historical traffic volume. But there are limits to this method as past historical traffic volume is not always available such as when traffic patterns change due to traffic accidents or new road construction [9]. The network consistency method requires accurate actual traffic volume information from the main line or ramp, but this can be difficult to collect [13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the traffic volume entering and exiting the road does not satisfy the traffic volume conservation law, which must be consistent with the traffic volume remaining in the corresponding section. Considering these limits, in some studies the measured traffic volume from the detector is assumed to be the actual traffic volume, and the measured traffic volume is corrected to satisfy the requirement of traffic volume balance within a certain [9]- [12]. However, since the measured traffic volume collected from the detector includes errors, the corrected measured traffic volume may cause larger errors when the traffic volume is corrected to achieve a traffic volume balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method to detect faulty sensors solely on the basis of currently observed data without relying on historical data was proposed by de Ona et al [12]. This method, which uses linear optimisation, has been applied to a small urban network with 7 intersections and 86 sensors.…”
Section: Related Work On Spatial Consistency Based Traffic Data Validmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to clearly distinguish between data “accuracy” and “validity.” Although both terms relate to data quality, accuracy in this article is defined as how close the measured value is to the actual value (e.g., the number of vehicles that cross the sensors versus the number counted), and validity is defined as whether the data record itself is correctly associated with the subject. For example, it is possible to automate the detection of malfunctioning sensors ( 29 ) and even cyberattacks ( 30 , 31 ), but a malfunctioning sensor in this context can still be “valid” even if it is so inaccurate that it cannot be used. In contrast, it is possible for a sensor to be operating normally and accurately but to be labeled incorrectly in a database and, thus, be invalid and accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%