2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Method to evaluate the adhesion behavior of aluminum-based alloys on various materials and coatings for lube-free die casting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a test, the sample-casting assembly is dismantled usually by a tensile testing machine, and a force required to perform such a process is recorded. This force is a measure of a bonding strength obtained between the sample and the casting material [17,20], i.e., the soldering tendency between paired materials. Examination of their surfaces provides additional information about the soldering process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a test, the sample-casting assembly is dismantled usually by a tensile testing machine, and a force required to perform such a process is recorded. This force is a measure of a bonding strength obtained between the sample and the casting material [17,20], i.e., the soldering tendency between paired materials. Examination of their surfaces provides additional information about the soldering process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of their surfaces provides additional information about the soldering process. Based on the relative movement performed between the sample and the casting during the separation, these tests can be divided into the ejection test [11,17] and the detachment test [20,21]. The ejection test is used for the evaluation of cylindrical pin samples overlapped by the casting, while the detachment is developed for evaluation of flat sample surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies presented in the literature involve on‐site testing on high‐pressure die‐casting presses submitted to real working conditions; this approach despite being the most accurate is very time consuming and expensive . A common approach in the characterization of die‐casting die materials or their surface modifications is to analyze one single damaging phenomenon at a time such as erosion, soldering, or thermal fatigue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to protect die casting molds, hard coatings deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD), such as TiN, CrN, (Cr,Al)N, Ti(C,N), Ti(B,N), or (Ti,Al)(C,N) [ 4 , 5 , 6 ] have been employed to act as a physical barrier to the die casting molding to prevent the erosion and soldering of aluminum and improve the resistance against thermal cracking [ 7 ]. Previous studies show that TiN presented good corrosion and erosion wear resistance [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, this coating is not a good solution for HPDC due to its low oxidation temperature [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies show that TiN presented good corrosion and erosion wear resistance [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, this coating is not a good solution for HPDC due to its low oxidation temperature [ 4 ]. TiAlN and TiSiN coatings exhibit good mechanical properties and also exhibit a better oxidation resistance up to 700 °C, however, their adhesion under substrate is reduced, which leads to sudden failures [ 8 ] during service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%