2018
DOI: 10.1002/bapi.201800030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methoden der Zeitreihenanalyse für die Bewertung von urbanen Gebäudesimulationen

Abstract: die Wurzel der mittleren quadratischen Abweichungen (RMSE) und eine relative Version, der Variationskoeffizient des RMSE (CV(RMSE)) in den Mittelpunkt gestellt. Trotz dieser umfangreichen Grundlagen zeigt eine Analyse des Konferenzbandes der Building Simulation Konferenz 2017 [6], dass 26 % der Veröffentlichungen den Empfehlungen der Richtlinie folgen, 20 % zusätzliche Methoden anwenden und 54 % auf einen rein visuellen Vergleich oder jährliche Integralwerte beschränkt sind. Dieser Beitrag zeigt daher die Mögl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implied glazing-to-frame area ratio of 1.5 results from observations on site. Variations 1 and 2 use an estimation for the interior component area (including walls, floors, and ceilings) that assumes rooms with a standard size of 6 m × 3 m. In the original implementation of TEASER, the floor area is separated into rooms and one wall per room is considered an exterior wall [36]. Although the estimation approach applies a modified formula that also considers the actual footprint and therefore does not overestimate thermal mass as much as the original one, the values are still higher than the reference values (see Section 2.1) of the building implemented in variations 3 to 6.…”
Section: Model Variations and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implied glazing-to-frame area ratio of 1.5 results from observations on site. Variations 1 and 2 use an estimation for the interior component area (including walls, floors, and ceilings) that assumes rooms with a standard size of 6 m × 3 m. In the original implementation of TEASER, the floor area is separated into rooms and one wall per room is considered an exterior wall [36]. Although the estimation approach applies a modified formula that also considers the actual footprint and therefore does not overestimate thermal mass as much as the original one, the values are still higher than the reference values (see Section 2.1) of the building implemented in variations 3 to 6.…”
Section: Model Variations and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these applications on urban scale, the modelling accuracy of individual buildings is reduced in favour of less computational effort, maintaining adequate accuracy on an aggregated level. The latter was confirmed for the combination of TEASER and AixLib by Remmen et al [33] and Lauster and Müller [36]. To increase individual building accuracy, promising calibration approaches exist [37]; however, they require substantial time series data to be collected in advance, which is again unsuitably laborious for small retrofit projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%