2011
DOI: 10.3103/s1068335611100058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodical problems of crosstalk probability measurements in solid-state photomultipliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution of the crosstalk probability p xt , as evaluated by fitting the modified Erlang distribution to the measured dark count spectra, is depicted in Figure 7. To account for coincident random breakdowns inside the integration window, the crosstalk probability is corrected as described in Futlik et al (2011). Using the measured dark count rate for each pixel, the crosstalk probability is corrected using formula (2) of the above paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the crosstalk probability p xt , as evaluated by fitting the modified Erlang distribution to the measured dark count spectra, is depicted in Figure 7. To account for coincident random breakdowns inside the integration window, the crosstalk probability is corrected as described in Futlik et al (2011). Using the measured dark count rate for each pixel, the crosstalk probability is corrected using formula (2) of the above paper.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we used a correction factor for the direct cross-talk (DiCT) calculation. Using the formula reported in [27] with a minor modification. In our case, the not-corrected cross-talk was calculated as the ratio of the count rate (or equivalently the probability) of the 2 p.e.…”
Section: Correlated Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last can be evaluated considering that at lower temperatures (meaning lower DCR) the OCT is less affected by the pile-up. Being the OCT 7.0 % at 3°C (DCR about 0.55 MCnts/s) and 9.0 % at 15°C (DCR about 1.3 MCnts/s), the pile-up effect can be derived considering the relation between the true and the apparent OCT [30]:…”
Section: A Dark Count Rate and Optical Cross-talkmentioning
confidence: 99%