1992
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530270032011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologic Considerations in Neuropsychologic Testing of Ataxic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the amount of supratentorial vascular lesions occurring in our patients may have masked the cognitive relevance of infratentorial lesions, and it is also possible that more specific neuropsychological tests might have shown other subtle cognitive effects. Actually, neuropsychological batteries including tests for visuospatial skills 30 showed abnormal results when used in subjects with predominant infratentorial pathology (eg, large vessel cerebellar infarcts, Friedreich ataxia, and olivopontocerebellar atrophy). 8 -10,31 On the other hand, we found that patients with midbrain atrophy had worse general cognitive and executive functions than the other VaD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the amount of supratentorial vascular lesions occurring in our patients may have masked the cognitive relevance of infratentorial lesions, and it is also possible that more specific neuropsychological tests might have shown other subtle cognitive effects. Actually, neuropsychological batteries including tests for visuospatial skills 30 showed abnormal results when used in subjects with predominant infratentorial pathology (eg, large vessel cerebellar infarcts, Friedreich ataxia, and olivopontocerebellar atrophy). 8 -10,31 On the other hand, we found that patients with midbrain atrophy had worse general cognitive and executive functions than the other VaD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain instances, judicious test selection may obviate the need to modify standardized tests. For example, Lalonde, Botez, and Botez (1992) used measures of visual spatial functions (e.g., Raven Matrices, Hooper Visual Organization Test) with no motor component in their study of patients with olivopontocerebellar atrophy (OPCA) who, virtually by definition, are motor-impaired. Clearly, the performance of OPCA patients on such measures as Block Design (Wechsler, 1981) or the Trail Making Test (Reitan 8c Tarshes, 1959) would be diminished by this factor alone and would complicate inferences about the extent to which other relevant abilities were compromised or preserved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%