1995
DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00172-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
273
0
23

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
273
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodologies used for the elaboration of this review were similar to those employed in systematic reviews. [13][14][15][16] Research strategy Our investigation was carried out using the Pubmed electronic database. The following combined descriptors were used: Prevention and Educational Activities and Hypertension; Prevention and Educational Activities and Obesity; Prevention and Educational Activities and Diabetes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodologies used for the elaboration of this review were similar to those employed in systematic reviews. [13][14][15][16] Research strategy Our investigation was carried out using the Pubmed electronic database. The following combined descriptors were used: Prevention and Educational Activities and Hypertension; Prevention and Educational Activities and Obesity; Prevention and Educational Activities and Diabetes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 We attempted to detect this source of bias through the construction of funnel plots. 54 This plot allowed us to assess, through visual inspection, whether most of the articles that were included in our analysis reported positive results. Fortunately, it appeared that there were an approximately equal number of both positive and negative trials making publication bias less likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests for heterogeneity of the OR was performed using the Cochrane Q method. 54 Homogeneity was assumed when P was > 0.10. 55 Heterogeneity was also evaluated visually using Galbraith plots.…”
Section: Statistical Methods and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion the available published articles conducted according to a stringent methodology that includes the identification, evaluation and synthesis of studies pertaining to a topic [7]. We conducted a search using databases in Medline, Current Contents and the Cochrane library but were unable to identify any previous systematic reviews on the anterior approach for cervical interbody fusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%