2020
DOI: 10.3390/ani10050759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological and Terminological Issues in Animal-Assisted Interventions: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Abstract: Recently, animal-assisted interventions (AAIs), which are defined as psychological, educational, and rehabilitation support activities, have become widespread in different contexts. For many years, they have been a subject of interest in the international scientific community and are at the center of an important discussion regarding their effectiveness and the most appropriate practices for their realization. We carried out an umbrella review (UR) of systematic reviews (SRs), created for the purpose of explor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…While long-acknowledged as practices across cultures, outdoor nature-based therapeutic interventions have grown significantly in number and type in recent years [ 3 ]. Outcomes research has supported outdoor therapeutic approaches as improving the lives and wellbeing of those experiencing mental health issues [ 4 , 5 ] as well as for general health promotion [ 6 ]. While an evidence base is present supporting exposure to nature and green spaces as ‘pathways’ toward comprehensive health benefits [ 7 ], a lack of comprehensive theoretical and conceptual articulation exists specifically for nature’s contribution or role in psychotherapy and mental health outcomes, leaving outdoor therapies without an explicit theory of change for their application as a clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While long-acknowledged as practices across cultures, outdoor nature-based therapeutic interventions have grown significantly in number and type in recent years [ 3 ]. Outcomes research has supported outdoor therapeutic approaches as improving the lives and wellbeing of those experiencing mental health issues [ 4 , 5 ] as well as for general health promotion [ 6 ]. While an evidence base is present supporting exposure to nature and green spaces as ‘pathways’ toward comprehensive health benefits [ 7 ], a lack of comprehensive theoretical and conceptual articulation exists specifically for nature’s contribution or role in psychotherapy and mental health outcomes, leaving outdoor therapies without an explicit theory of change for their application as a clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of interaction with dogs in the healthcare context mainly consist of outcomes from animal-assisted therapies (AATs), defined as a therapeutic intervention incorporating animals to improve health and wellness [ 2 ]. In particular, AATs with dogs represent non-pharmacological therapies or co-therapies to support psychotherapy or other therapies [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]. AAT interventions have been applied to address different kinds of illness, including adults and children with autism spectrum disorder [ 8 , 9 ], people with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], and during psychotherapy for adolescents [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAI has been widely implemented in a range of physio-social conditions in various settings in healthcare facilities and is becoming increasingly popular, especially for pediatric patients. AAI is an umbrella term that encompasses animal-assisted therapy (programs with a set clinical outcome), animal-assisted education (programs with a set educational/developmental outcome), and animal-assisted activities (programs without a pre-specified outcome) [ 1 , 2 ]. The most commonly reported patient benefits include a reduction in patients’ requirement for pain medication, enhanced socialization, and reduced stress and anxiety [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%