2003
DOI: 10.3354/meps253067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological bias in the estimations of important meroplanktonic components from near-shore bottoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diminished larval supply might explain the poor colonization of the substratum at the most internal zones of the caves, since larvae of the main benthic taxa living inside the caves (sponges, bryozoans and ascidians) have not been found in the corresponding planktonic compartment (Palau et al, 1991). However, the di⁄culty in larval iden-ti¢cation of several Phyla (mainly sponges, Mariani et al, 2003) casts some doubt on the absence of larvae in these caves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A diminished larval supply might explain the poor colonization of the substratum at the most internal zones of the caves, since larvae of the main benthic taxa living inside the caves (sponges, bryozoans and ascidians) have not been found in the corresponding planktonic compartment (Palau et al, 1991). However, the di⁄culty in larval iden-ti¢cation of several Phyla (mainly sponges, Mariani et al, 2003) casts some doubt on the absence of larvae in these caves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the number of sponge species and their coverage clearly decreased from the external to the internal zone in the Medes cave, both descriptors reached the highest values in the innermost zone (Zone 4) of the Cabrera cave. The di¡erences in species composition (only 38 species out of 62 were present in both the caves) may be due to the geographical isolation of both the caves, and the low dispersal capacity of sponges (Harmelin, 1985;Mariani et al, 2003). When we compare the sponge species composition of the caves studied with that of other Mediterranean caves (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High recovery levels up to 80% are achieved with this methodology (Theron, 1986). Difficulties associated with inappropriate sampling techniques have previously been highlighted with marine lecithotrophic meroplankton (Mariani et al, 2003) suggesting such problems may be widespread. Clearly therefore, techniques used for traditional freshwater zooplankton studies are unsuitable, both in terms of net mesh size and the rough handling involved, to successfully collect and identify cercariae in sufficient numbers to be able to properly evaluate their presence in ecosystems.…”
Section: Cercariae Within the Zooplankton Community: Practical Considmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To perform the samplings in a single dive the net was connected to a 60-ml syringe by means of a plastic funnel. After each sampling the net contents were extracted while underwater with a syringe that was used as container for samples (see Mariani et al 2000Mariani et al , 2003Mariani et al , 2005a for more details). The samples were transported to the laboratory immediately after collection and sorted in vivo to identify the sponge larvae.…”
Section: Assessing Adult and Larval Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponge larvae are ideal organisms to test dispersal strategies because they are uniformly non-feeding and short-lived (except for rare known exceptions). Mariani et al (2003) have shown that assemblages of sponge larvae remain in the immediate vicinity of parental habitats on a northwest Mediterranean rocky shore. Retention seems the most probable pattern for sponge larval dispersal in the Weld since they reputedly live only a few hours in the plankton (Maldonado and Bergquist 2002) and have virtually never been collected in oV-shore plankton .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%