Methodological Considerations for Advancing Research on the Health and Wellbeing of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

Abstract

Continued research with sexual and gender minority (SGM) youth is essential both to understand health disparities and to develop interventions targeting those disparities, but conducting rigorous, ethical research with these populations remains a substantial challenge. In addition to considerations for research with adolescents in general, such as utilizing developmentally appropriate measures and obtaining parental permission, factors unique to SGM youth must be addressed at every step of the research process. Defining the study population is complex, as is recruiting a sample once it is defined. Measurement is another challenge, given the paucity of measures developed for or validated with SGM samples. Key constructs, such as sexual orientation, gender identity, and family acceptance, are not amenable to randomization and involving minor participants' parents poses ethical concerns given the precarious home and safety situations that can arise from employing typical study procedures with youth who have a stigmatized identity. In this article, we examine some of these unique methodological challenges. Informed by theoretical and empirical literature, practical experience, and an ongoing dialogue with SGM youth themselves, we present a guide to best practices for ethical, productive research with SGM youth. By discussing existing approaches to studying SGM youth and suggesting innovative ways to approach the questions that remain, we hope to assist the research community in addressing methodological gaps to advance research on SGM youth in relation to families and schools.

Self-Reported Health and Patterns of Romantic Love in Adolescents from Eight European Countries and Regions

“…Selfreported health, similar to health status perceived by others, may also be influenced by sexual minority status. 69 We also acknowledge that love is just one facet of sexual orientation, and for a comprehensive picture, sexual desire, identity, and gender of sexual partners should also be investigated. 28 We used binary variables to determine the gender of both respondents' and their partners (boys or girls).…”

The Moderating Effect of Comfort from Companion Animals and Social Support on the Relationship between Microaggressions and Mental Health in LGBTQ+ Emerging Adults

“…The term sexual minority is often used to refer to individuals whose sexual orientation falls outside the scope of the dominant culture of heteronormative sexuality; examples include, but are not limited to, men who have sex with men; women who have sex with women; pansexual, bisexual, asexual, and queer-identified people. In the current work, the term gender minority is used to refer to those whose gender identity and/or expression does not align with or conform to societal expectations (perceived by others as a gender expression not typical of their biological sex), such as transgender, gender expansive, and non-binaryidentified people [6]. The Minority Stress Model [7] is a conceptual framework that has Behav.…”

Sexual and Reproductive Health Web Sites: An Analysis of Content for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

“…This challenge of appropriately and comprehensively addressing all SGM populations is not unique to health education-for example, SGM health researchers face similar issues in defining and measuring sexual orientation, such as whether to use attraction, behavior, and/or identity. 25 Given the general lack of attention to content specific to certain populations of SGM youth, it is not surprising that some SRH topics were not extensively addressed. For example, few web sites contained information regarding HRT and puberty blockers, topics particularly salient to transgender youth.…”