2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac149c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methodological considerations for interrupted time series analysis in radiation epidemiology: an overview

Abstract: Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) is a method that can be applied to evaluate health outcomes in populations exposed to ionizing radiation following major radiological events. Using aggregated time series data, ITSA evaluates whether the time trend of a health indicator shows a change associated with the radiological event. That is, ITSA checks whether there is a statistically significant discrepancy between the projection of a pre-event trend and the data empirically observed after the event. Conducting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second epidemiologically related paper of interest is that by Wollschläger et al (2021). This addresses the issue of what can legitimately be inferred from an interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) in which the time trend of a health indicator is studied to determine whether there is a statistically significant discrepancy between the projection of a trend that existed prior to a radiologically relevant event and the empirically observed trend after that event.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second epidemiologically related paper of interest is that by Wollschläger et al (2021). This addresses the issue of what can legitimately be inferred from an interrupted time-series analysis (ITSA) in which the time trend of a health indicator is studied to determine whether there is a statistically significant discrepancy between the projection of a trend that existed prior to a radiologically relevant event and the empirically observed trend after that event.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%